Publication information |
Source: Case and Comment Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “Laws Against Anarchy” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: September 1901 Volume number: 8 Issue number: 4 Pagination: 184-85 |
Citation |
“Laws Against Anarchy.” Case and Comment Sept. 1901 v8n4: pp. 184-85. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (public response: criticism); anarchism (dealing with); anarchism (laws against); assassination (laws against). |
Named persons |
none. |
Document |
Laws Against Anarchy
“Enemies of the human race,” the name long given
to pirates, has a more intense and fearful meaning when applied to anarchists.
A chorus of proposals to exterminate them comes from all over the United States.
Some editorials on the subject are thoughtful and discriminating; others are
full of earnestness and of a demand for restrictive laws, but without any apparent
conception of the principles involved. First of all, it must be clearly perceived
that the acceptance and teaching of the doctrine that anarchy is an ideal condition
of human life may be totally distinct from the approval and instigation of violent
and incendiary methods to overthrow existing governments. Liberty to
think and to speak freely under the guaranties of our constitutions are sacred
rights which must not be abridged. But instigation to crime is not included
within such liberty. Every enlightened American ought to stand firm against
every suggestion to abandon our constitutional principles of freedom. Some of
the wild and passionate utterances, natural enough, indeed, when men are under
strong feelings of indignation and horror at an attempted assassination of the
President, sound like words from a darker age. The laments expressed by some
prominent men on account of the constitutional barriers to an effective campaign
against anarchy are not creditable to their statesmanship. The safety of civilization
needs no measures that are not in harmony with our constitutional guaranties.
The most rigid measures against instigating or in any way counseling or encouraging
assassination or other crime committed in the cause of anarchy, whether such
instigation or advocacy is given by book or by speech, would not violate any
constitutional rights. On the other hand, laws against believing or teaching
that anarchy as a philosophical or political system is an ideal condition of
things would be as obnoxious to all true principles of any desirable society
as they would be to our existing constitutions.
Effective measures to protect our President and
other officers against anarchists are imperatively demanded. Proposals to exclude
or deport them from the country may deserve consideration, but these alone cannot
be sufficient. We need to strike at the instigation of crime by a law substantially
to this effect: “Any person who shall advocate, counsel, advise, or by expressing
approval encourage, any act or policy of assassination, murder, or assault upon
the President of the United States or any other officer or person as a means
of overthrowing or destroying the govern- [184][185]
ment, or of aiding any attempt, plan, or purpose to overthrow or destroy the
government, shall be guilty of a felony, and shall be punished by death.”