Publication information |
Source: Cleveland Medical Gazette Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “Criticism of the Late President’s Physicians” Author(s): Smith, George Seeley Date of publication: November 1901 Volume number: 17 Issue number: 1 Pagination: 49-50 |
Citation |
Smith, George Seeley. “Criticism of the Late President’s Physicians.” Cleveland Medical Gazette Nov. 1901 v17n1: pp. 49-50. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
William McKinley (medical care: criticism: personal response); William McKinley (surgery); William McKinley (medical condition). |
Named persons |
William McKinley. |
Document |
Criticism of the Late President’s Physicians
We regret to see a tendency in certain quarters
to criticise the medical treatment of our late President.
Such criticism is as much out of place as it is
uncalled for and is a product of the most brazen effrontery, showing either
motives of a vindictive and unworthy order, or else giving evidence of a colossal
conceit so pronounced that it closely resembles absolute ignorance.
Fortunately the bumptiousness of these self appointed
[sic] critics is so apparent that their flippancy injures only themselves.
[49][50]
It is refreshing to turn from such sickly criticism
to the wholesome account of the medical aspect given by a lay author in the
November number of Pearson’s Magazine. The matter is so well and concisely put
that we take the liberty of making the following quotations: “Within thirty
minutes after the attack upon the President two specialists in operations of
this kind were at hand, and another was on his way as fast as a special train
could carry him. To these surgeons the President’s wounds conveyed a single
imperative demand: ‘Instant action.’ No governmental red tape now; no halting
for consultation or the voice of vested authority; but coats off, and to work
to save the most valued life in the country! The President was ready as he had
been ready at every emergency in his career. ‘Do whatever you think necessary,
gentlemen,’ he said. That was his calm assent to an operation from which he
knew that he might not emerge.
The rapidity with which the operation was performed
stands as a record of quick work in surgery. If prompt action could have saved
him, the President would be alive still. Science did its utmost, but without
the co-operation of Nature it was helpless. * * *
The case of President McKinley was remarkable in its medical aspects.
The rapid apparent improvement of the patient and his evidence of swiftly returning
strength seemingly misled the physicians themselves into believing that he was
on the way to recovery.
The actual conditions revealed by the death of
the President proved that the symptoms that had caused the previous encouragement
were altogether deceptive. There had been no slightest effort on the part of
the bodily faculties to repair the damage that had been done. How it happened
that Mr. McKinley seemed to be gaining so rapidly when really he was moving
swiftly nearer and nearer to the grave the physicians themselves have not fully
explained.”