Publication information |
Source: Carolina Medical Journal Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “The Remuneration of President McKinley’s Doctors” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: January 1902 Volume number: 48 Issue number: 1 Pagination: 1-2 |
Citation |
“The Remuneration of President McKinley’s Doctors.” Carolina Medical Journal Jan. 1902 v48n1: pp. 1-2. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley physicians (payment). |
Named persons |
James A. Garfield; William McKinley. |
Document |
The Remuneration of President McKinley’s Doctors
We notice that this subject is being discussed
in some of the newspapers, and we trust it will be taken up by Congress at an
early date and the accounts satisfactorily adjusted. Congress surely does not
need to be reminded that these services were rendered to Mr. McKinley not as
an ordinary citizen, but as President of the United States. The obligation is
a National one and should not be a charge against the martyred President’s estate.
In the case of President Garfield, this obligation was recognized by Congress,
but if our memory serves us, there were some unnecessary discussion and some
rather unseemly haggling over the settlement. It is not the part of outsiders
to determine the value of these services or to suggest the size of the fees,
but it is evident that these latter should be proportioned to the eminence of
the patient, the importance of these services, the standing of the attendants,
and the responsibility of the case. It is not inappropriate or indelicate to
call attention to the fact that the mere risks to professional reputations involved
in such a momentous and critical case are certainly as great as, if not greater
than, any risks assumed by any proffessional [sic] men in any other circumstances
whatever. From the legitimate business standpoint, such risks are not among
those which physicians and surgeons can afford to assume for mere sentiment
or should be called upon to meet without ample compensation. [1][2]
The medical conduct of the lamented President’s case was conspicuously free
from selfish, jealous, unworthy motives. The physicians and surgeons performed
a grave public duty without a taint of self-seeking or of vainglory. It is appropriate
now that they should be well remunerated by the American people.
We regard the above, copied from an exchange,
as a very clear statement of this much-discussed question, giving as it does
what would seem unanswerable reasons for the contention of the present surgeons
that their fees should be paid by the National government and not by the estate
of the deceased.