| Publication information | 
| Source: Dietetic and Hygienic Gazette Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “Was President McKinley’s Case Badly Managed?” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: October 1901 Volume number: 17 Issue number: 10 Pagination: 625 | 
| Citation | 
| “Was President McKinley’s Case Badly Managed?” Dietetic and Hygienic Gazette Oct. 1901 v17n10: p. 625. | 
| Transcription | 
| full text | 
| Keywords | 
| William McKinley (medical care: personal response); William McKinley (medical care: criticism); William McKinley (medical condition); William McKinley (death, cause of). | 
| Named persons | 
| William McKinley. | 
| Document | 
  Was President McKinley’s Case Badly Managed?
      A  who 
  does not care to have his name mentioned asks this question.
       The editor of the G 
  fully appreciates the surprise and bitter disappointment that naturally followed 
  the sudden and fatal termination of this phenomenal case after the hopeful announcements 
  made by the eminent medical staff in attendance. In the very midst of services 
  of praise and thanksgiving for the assurances of a sure and quick recovery came 
  the blighting despatch [sic] that the President was dying!
       We do not feel competent to criticize the treatment 
  adopted by the eminent staff of medical and surgical advisers who gave such 
  unremitting attention to the illustrious patient. If we were so disposed we 
  have not the necessary data. “Beef tea” is not now considered of much value 
  as food, and chicken soup is far from ideal, except among grandmas and domestic 
  doctors. But the daily press may have substituted these names for other products 
  of similar origin but of far more value. Reporters are marvelously wise, but 
  they frequently perpetrate medical bulls that are decidedly funny when they 
  are not too serious.
       We do not, therefore, agree with those professional 
  critics who assert that the President was starved to death.
       We cannot understand how the medical men in attendance 
  could commit themselves to such a hopeful prognosis in the face of the persistently 
  high pulse-rate. The temperature, as reported, was never excessively high, but 
  the pulse-rate remained most or all the time after the shooting above 120.
       Such a pulse in a man of President McKinley’s 
  reputed vigor is ominous of great danger. It indicated severe vital depression. 
  The attendant symptoms and the outcome prove that the physical condition of 
  the patient was far from vigorous. The enormous and persistent strain imposed 
  upon the head of a powerful nation, undergoing years of political stress, such 
  as it has not known since the days of the Rebellion, is enough to try the best 
  constitutions. When we add to this the terrible suspense and constant anxiety 
  from the domestic trial through which President McKinley had just passed, and 
  from which he could not have fully recovered, it is not to be wondered at that 
  he could not recover from a gunshot wound that but a few years back would have 
  been considered inevitably fatal.
       To this may be added that he was an inveterate 
  smoker, which certainly does not add to the chances of any invalid. One eminent 
  critic of the treatment of the dead President expresses the opinion that his 
  smoking had nothing to do with the fatal result; but we suspect that this commentator 
  is himself a smoker. The heart-walls were described as very thin. It was undoubtedly 
  to a certain degree a “smoker’s heart,” and for that reason certainly succumbed 
  more easily.
       We think the President died because his system 
  was vitally degenerate and could not recoup from the shock of the assassin’s 
  bullet, as a more vigorous system, seconded by the rare surgical skill so promptly 
  and efficiently invoked, would surely have done. Gangrene does not occur in 
  tissues that are made scrupulously aseptic, as was surely done in this case, 
  and that are normally nourished and vitally up to par.