[untitled]
SINCE our last issue the entire country, regardless of section
or political faith, has united in one of the most general and most
sincere exhibitions of sorrow over the death of an individual that
the world has ever seen. Party lines were forgotten in the universal
tribute of respect for and appreciation of the services of a worthy
president and an honest man, and in the unanimous voice of execration
and abhorrence of the dastardly deed of the assassin. The dismal
tragedy has served to call attention to the dangers lurking in the
anarchical teaching that the personal rights of the individual are
greater than the rights of the society that makes the life of that
individual possible. There is no room in free America for the assassin
of its public servants or for the teaching that is responsible for
awakening the assassin’s bloody purpose.
The murder of the president serves
also to direct attention to the possible evil effects from publishing
the absurd, unwarranted and extravagantly untrue attacks upon our
public servants in high places, that have disgraced the columns
of some of the so called “yellow journals” in this country. Although
the wild and indiscriminate attacks may, by their very excess, defeat
the purpose intended with all right minded citizens, they serve
to stir up the passions of the fanatical, and offer tools by means
of which the enemies of social order stir to feelings of hatred
and arouse to deeds of violence the misguided souls who hunger to
become “martyrs” to what they have been taught to consider as the
cause of individualistic freedom—the slavery of an idea.
Take, for instance, a typical bit
of such vituperation as it appeared in the New York Journal,
when it published—
And McKinley—bar one girthy
Princeton person, who came to be no more, no less, than a living
crime in breeches—is, therefore, the most despised and hated
creature in the hemisphere. His name is hooted; his figure burned
in effigy.
Such language, directed against
two of the country’s foremost men and worthiest presidents, is little
short of criminal. It is from just such indecent lies that the enemies
of this country at home and abroad draw their conclusions about
the political conditions here. It is such stuff that the anarchist
leaders present before their fanatical followers as evidence of
the “true character” of the rulers whom the anarchist is taught
to despise, and the poor dupes become more easily inflamed to rid
the earth of such a “tyrant.” Is it not time that public opinion
were aroused to the enormity of the offense of which these “yellow”
sheets are guilty, and an agitation begun that would end in stamping
out such utterances by burying them under public scorn? To submit
to such indecent publications is beneath the dignity of American
citizenship.
|