Publication information |
Source: Memphis Medical Monthly Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “President McKinley’s Death” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: October 1901 Volume number: 21 Issue number: 10 Pagination: 553-54 |
Citation |
“President McKinley’s Death.” Memphis Medical Monthly Oct. 1901 v21n10: pp. 553-54. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
William McKinley (death: personal response); William McKinley (medical condition); William McKinley (death, cause of); William McKinley (medical care: personal response). |
Named persons |
William McKinley. |
Document |
President McKinley’s Death
A
A few days ago the profession as a whole were
felicitating themselves upon the excellent results being obtained in the case
of the President by the skill of the surgeons in attendance upon the honored
victim to the would be assassin’s bullet, and the favorable bulletins that were
almost hourly being published by these surgeons caused a feeling of general
rejoicing throughout not merely the United States but the entire civilized world.
But this season of rejoicing was broken by a sudden change in the President’s
condition, and within forty-eight hours after the last favorable bulletin was
issued the President breathed his last.
The revelations of the autopsy in this case have
shown that a gangrenous process developed in the track of the bullet which pierced
the walls of the stomach, a totally unlooked for result, and one that could
not have been prevented by any known human means. This gangrenous process had
evidently developed during the last two or three days of the distinguished patient’s
illness, and death followed no more speedily than is usually the case in such
conditions. [553][554]
It seems that a singular fatality is associated
with operative procedures upon heads of government.
While the mortality from gunshot wounds of the
abdomen is more than 50%, even under the most advantageous circumstances of
modern aseptic and antiseptic surgery, it is not an unusual thing for recovery
to follow in cases that have been operated upon for even graver lesions than
were apparent in the President’s case. This is true especially in the South,
where gunshot wounds, frequently occurring in persons of low station and unhygienic
surroundings, are daily operated for, and a gratifying proportion of these cases
go on to recovery. Unfortunately, however, even with a staff of surgeons of
not merely national but also international reputation, this exalted patient
was not permitted to recover, and the autopsy revealed the reason of this. That
the President was of low vitality from his sedentary life must be inferred,
and therefore his lack of power of resistance explained. But no matter what
the bodily health of the individual, it may be well to add, where gangrene had
developed as in this case, the result would have been the same.
No word of censure should be brought to bear upon
the surgeons here concerned, for certainly they did all that modern surgical
skill and knowledge could dictate to prevent this sad termination, and we can
only console ourselves in the last words of the departed President—“It is God’s
way; His will be done.”