Publication information |
Source: Medical Magazine Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “President McKinley” Author(s): Forsbeck, Filip A. Date of publication: 15 October 1901 Volume number: 1 Issue number: 2 Pagination: 61-62 |
Citation |
Forsbeck, Filip A. “President McKinley.” Medical Magazine 15 Oct. 1901 v1n2: pp. 61-62. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
William McKinley (medical care: personal response). |
Named persons |
William McKinley. |
Notes |
From journal cover: Filip A. Forsbeck, M. D., Associate Editor. |
Document |
President McKinley
It would be conspicuous at this time, not to
refer in brief to the tragic death of our martyr president. The press reports
have been clear and full, giving in detail all that pertains to this national
calamity. Suffice it for us then to comment upon the medical and surgical experience
of the men, who unfortunately were chosen but so skilfully [sic] discharged
their duties in the attempt of saving the President’s life. The promptness in
decision which characterized the surgeons in attendance immediately following
the crime is the strongest evidence of mature judgment coupled with courage
and tact, that could possibly be expected in such an emergency as this.
There is no question that operations more delicate
or requiring greater surgical skill, than in the one performed on this illustrious
patient, have been undertaken before and carried to a successful termination,
but this case was somewhat extraordinary. The entire nation was watching with
a critical eye, every move, every step, of the surgeons, and the American people
built its hopes on their technical skill, and the efficacy of modern surgical
methods. And well knowing this and fully realizing the responsibility of the
trying ordeal so suddenly thrust upon them, the physicians were not baffled
but did their duty and did it well, deserving of approbation and gratitude of
the nation. The condition of the patient at the time of and immeditaely [sic]
following the operation was most promising and apparently the science of surgery
would in this case be able to successfully cope with the emergency. But the
final outcome proved different, not because of the lack or limitation of knowledge
of those in attendance, but because of pathological complications which no man
could anticipate, discover or prevent. With the facts before us, as far as we
know them, we must agree that the President had the best medical and surgical
services that the world produces and that no stigma of criticism should be reflected
on those heroic men. The medical profession should sustain their actions and
by word and pen denounce their malicous [sic] critics.
Meanwhile we will in heartfelt sorrow lament over
his [61][62] untimely death and by reverence for
his character and admiration for his deeds cherish the memory of President William
McKinley.