Publication information |
Source: New England Medical Monthly Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “Insanity and Crime” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: December 1901 Volume number: 20 Issue number: 12 Pagination: 491 |
Citation |
“Insanity and Crime.” New England Medical Monthly Dec. 1901 v20n12: p. 491. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
anarchism (psychology of); criminals (dealing with). |
Named persons |
Charles J. Guiteau; William McKinley. |
Document |
Insanity and Crime
THE uneventful exit of the assassin of the late President McKinley and the
assertion that there was nothing particularly striking in his anatomical make-up,
suggest several important questions for future consideration. The chief one
is that regarding the mental responsibility of the Anarchist or Nihilist, and
what restrictive measures should be enforced by the countries infected by his
presence. The task of determining the mental condition of these individuals
is an extremely difficult one, for the nearer we approach the border line of
insanity the harder it becomes to obtain facts and draw deductions.
A prominent specialist remarks: “There is the
difficulty, if not the actual impossibility, of determining the precise boundary
line between mental health and mental disease. Rarely do we find in society
a specimen of a perfectly normal and harmonious adjustment of all the powers
of the mind.” This faulty adjustment is nowhere more apparent than in the cases
in question, and here, as a rule, we find anatomical variations which serve
as corroborative evidence.
While Guiteau was declared sane by several eminent
specialists, the pathological findings were, to say the least, very suggestive
of impaired mental power, and were a careful examination of the brain of the
President’s assassin obtainable, we feel sure that a pathogical [sic]
cause for his action could be demonstrated.
Another recent case in point is that of a trained
nurse of more than average intelligence who without apparent motive, is said
to have indulged in a wholesale poisoning of her patients.
While a large proportion of our criminals possess
a faulty anatomical development, we are often called upon to decide, simply
by a personal interview, the question of mental responsibility, and we may be
asked whether a person of fair intelligence and some education who murders indiscriminately,
or who believes in civil chaos and a reign of terror and who willingly sacrifices
his life for the advancement of such a cause, is to be considered a rational
being. Most alienists we believe, would decide in the negative, and in the absence
of a reasonable motive, would unhesitatingly commit such a person to an asylum.
At the same time, however, we are unable to define the degree of perverted thought
which converts a vicious into an insane action.
It is important that at this time the true status
of these cases should be decided upon and that we should classify the many dangerous
members of society now existing in this country in order that prompt and effective
justice may be meted out to them whenever occasion demands.