Publication information |
Source: Philadelphia Medical Journal Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “The Assassin” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: 21 September 1901 Volume number: 8 Issue number: 12 Pagination: 463 |
Citation |
“The Assassin.” Philadelphia Medical Journal 21 Sept. 1901 v8n12: p. 463. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (personal response). |
Named persons |
Cesare Lombroso. |
Document |
The Assassin
The world once more stands aghast
at the crime of an unrestrained Nihilist. The American people—impotent in their
benevolence, tolerant to the last degree of any and every extreme social and
political heresy that airs itself under the aegis of free speech—stand at the
bier of one of their best beloved Chief Magistrates, and tacitly confess that
they see no remedy under the constitution and the laws. The situation, shorn
of its elements of direst tragedy, would be grim in its suggestion merely of
what is helpless and maladroit.
To the mind of the sociologist—of the scientist
who studies the pathology of the body politic, just as the physician studies
that of the body physical—the situation does not present itself as such a paradox.
If there is any standing principle in pathology it is that a disease process
should be rooted out. This whole cankerous process of nihilism and anarchy is
a disease—social and political infection.
Let no one misapprehend the real elements of this
problem. We do not intend for a moment to raise in these columns the threshed
out questions of insanity and responsibility. Fortunately and indubitably these
questions ought not to be raised in this case. But there may be more than one
kind of pathological process in the state. Ignorance, superstition, crime, class
hatred, insanity and degeneracy—these are not interchangeable terms. However
closely they may dovetail with one another (and that they are mutually reinforceful
is not to be denied) they are nevertheless distinct and individual. They must
be studied apart as well as together. They must be analyzed and dissected, and
the morbid state of each must be differentiated. The modern school, headed by
Lombroso, which confuses criminality and insanity, has gone too far. Ignorance
is more potent than either of these for harm to the State.
So long as a civilized state commits itself to
the theory that any harebrained doctrines are harmless (and therefore permissble
[sic]) so long as they are merely spoken, just so long will such a state
be subject to the rude surprises that come when such doctrines are bodied forth
in deeds. To such a rude surprise have we come now in this country, as we sit
in our supreme sorrow and our profound humiliation. This assassination is the
foul discharge of a local gangrene in the political body, and the moral, drawn
from medical science, is obvious.