Publication information |
Source: Leslie’s Weekly Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “The President’s Message” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: 5 October 1901 Volume number: 93 Issue number: 2404 Pagination: 302 |
Citation |
“The President’s Message.” Leslie’s Weekly 5 Oct. 1901 v93n2404: p. 302. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
William McKinley (last public address: personal response); Theodore Roosevelt (first annual message to Congress); William McKinley (presidential policies); United States (trade policy); William McKinley (public statements). |
Named persons |
William McKinley; Theodore Roosevelt. |
Document |
The President’s Message
T
It will be remarkable if these suggestions do
not constitute the principal recommendations of the new President’s message,
as they were obviously the most striking and important utterances of his predecessor.
Few Presidents have taken the public as fully into their confidence as had President
McKinley. On more than one important occasion he outlined an important public
policy before taking final action, with an evident purpose to give the people
time for its thoughtful consideration and for an expression of public opinion.
He could not have chosen a better time or place for his latest and most important
utterance than that which he selected at Buffalo. He had a magnificent audience,
gathered from every section of the country, and their approval of his policy
was hearty and sincere.
It was a bold thing for a Republican President,
and one who had for years been regarded as the chief exponent and expounder
of the doctrine of protection, as President McKinley had been, to advocate a
departure from a cardinal principle of his party. That a change is necessary,
now that our home market is secure, and that additional markets for our surplus
products must be sought for abroad, few will deny. President McKinley, with
his accustomed felicity of phrasing, gave public notice that “the period of
exclusiveness is passed” [sic]. He said:
“The expansion of our trade and commerce is the
pressing problem. Commercial wars are unprofitable. A policy of good-will and
friendly trade relations will prevent reprisals. Reciprocity treaties are in
harmony with the spirit of the times; measures of retaliation are not. If perchance
some of our tariffs are no longer needed for revenue, or to encourage and protect
our industries at home, why should they not be employed to extend and promote
our markets abroad?”
This ringing appeal for a new departure must be
heard. It is the first question that ought to be considered at the approaching
Congress. That body has its work already well cut out.