Publication information |
Source: Lucifer, the Light-Bearer Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “Meaning of the Pageant” Author(s): Harman, Moses Date of publication: 28 September 1901 Volume number: 5 Issue number: 37 Series: third series Pagination: 300 |
Citation |
Harman, Moses. “Meaning of the Pageant.” Lucifer, the Light-Bearer 28 Sept. 1901 v5n37 (3rd series): p. 300. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley funeral services; society (criticism). |
Named persons |
William McKinley. |
Notes |
The date of publication provided by the magazine is September 28, E.
M. 301.
Whole No. 884.
Alternate magazine title: Lucifer, the Lightbearer. |
Document |
Meaning of the Pageant
Since our last Lucifer went to press the greatest
funeral pageant ever seen in this country, if not the greatest ever known in
the history of the Anglo-Saxon race, has come and gone. Besides the public demonstrations
of grief the private or household tributes of affection and honor for the dead
President were such as were never heard of before.
Without attempting a description of these public
and private tributes to the memory of the late William McKinley I wish rather
to briefly consider the ethical meaning, the political import, of these phenomenal,
these wholly unprecedented demonstrations. To sum the matter up in one short
phrase, the public and private tributes of respect, of honor and affection paid
to the memory the [sic] departed ruler, mean first and chiefly—
Admitting for the argument that William McKinley
was a model man in all the relations of life—as citizen, as husband, as father,
as friend, as lawyer or member of any other profession or vocation, it must
be admitted that such honors were quite out of place in a land of so-called
republican simplicity and equality.
Neither could all this phenomenal demonstration
have been caused by the fact that McKinley was the
of eighty millions of free and independent people, since, as representing others,
he could expect no greater honor than the individual persons he is supposed
to represent. If he was a representative American citizen his funeral should
have been in accord with that idea, which, as I understand it, means the
of, the negation of, the pomp and display commonly associated with the monarchies
and aristocracies of the old world.
What then? Simply that we are forced to the conclusion
that these funeral honors typify and symbolize the changed American ideals.
Honors paid to McKinley are not honors paid to the man, the citizen, or the
representative of Republicanism—in its true meaning, that of a
in which all are equal—but honors paid to the chief
for which the McKinley administration stood sponsor.
That idea, that principle, that standard of action,
or goal of ambition, as we all know, was political ,
territorial , commercial ,
adoption of the tactics of England in India and South Africa, of Russia in Asia,
of Spain in the days of its emperors—in one word, .
The obsequies that put away from sight the mortal
remains of William McKinley, may be said, in no highly strained figurative sense,
to have buried also about all that was left of the old ideas of republican simplicity
and equality of rights for all and special privileges for none.