A New-Kindled Flame
THAT the circumstances immediately attendant upon the death of
President McKinley have deeply impressed the popular mind and heart
cannot be doubted. Quite aside from the fact that the President
was the victim of an assassin there was that about his end which
touched something in the people’s nature more profound even than
patriotism or personal affection. The event, as it has been faithfully
described in the public prints,appealed [sic] with singularly effective
directness to the religious nature of Mr. McKinley’s countrymen.
The simple story of his dying moments has undoubtedly awakened in
the populace a great deal of the faith and simple trust that we
have been led to believe were passing from the world.
There was no priest to shrive the
Chief Magistrate, no minister to console him, no sacramental ceremonies
of impressive symbolic significances. He died in patient, humble
submission to God’s will and murmuring his conviction that death’s
protals [sic] opened for him only to admit him nearer to the Divine.
His simple faith in the goodness of God and the beneficence of death,
given voice in almost the same breath in which he bade farewell
to her to whom he had been “a lover all his days” touched a somewhat
cynical world to the deep-hidden quick of old, sweet, spiritual
memories. Here was a great one of the earth who believed the old,
fond things, that certain new brazen things had proclaimed effete.
Here was a doer of things surrendering unto death without a trace
of pride of place or pride of power. Here was the executant of the
will of mighty millions recognizing the will of One who doeth all
things well, even though through the pain and anguish of His instruments.
This man, who might have been supposed to take some credit to himself
for mastery of circumstance, faced death with a calm childlikeness
that added to the glory of his days by just what it so serenely
put away as of nothing worth. He believed in God, he feared God,
he trusted God, he hoped in God. God was his refuge at the last,
as the world and its one face sweeter than all faded from his sight.
There was no insistence upon any particular
religious cult or creed. There was no trace of any formalism, of
fine drawn distinctions of doctrine or discipline. The faith in
which the President died was a faith so simple and so wide that
it could be accepted by every one of the civilized myriads who waited
sorrowing while he swooned into the silence and the shadow. The
selfless aspiration “God’s will be done” was from the one prayer
that is all mankind’s—the Lord’s Prayer. The refrain from the old
hymn “Nearer my God to Thee” speaks a faith and hope that lurk at
the bottom of all creeds. The universality of the application of
each utterance went home to every heart. The world felt that these
expressions were almost miraculously sufficient. No mortal could
have said more before the mystery soon to receive him. Faith could
say no more. Reason could say no more. Hope could hope for nothing
more. Love could yearn for nothing more. The life of the man was,
somehow, summarized in his last words. No one who contemplated the
scene in the light of the dying man’s career could fail to preceive
[sic] that it had been an honest effort to do God’s will. The man’s
life had been one long devotion. He had borne his crosses uncomplainingly.
He had never failed in gentleness. He had never shirked a duty.
His public career had been a singularly consistent demonstration
of his determination to do his best as he saw it, but always with
an intensely conscious recognition of the Divine Will as the last
supreme authority. Do we not all remember, now, that there were
times when we called this turning to the Divine Will “fatalism,”
“opportunism,” “drifting”? Yes, and some of us called it worse things
still, like “cant” and “hypocrisy.” And now the manifestation of
this attitude of mind and soul in his last dark hour comes upon
us to stab us with remorse for our own uncharity. How forcibly come
back to us the old words “as a man lives, so shall he die.”
There is no manner of doubt that the
quiet pathos of the President’s trust and hope has touched us all
to a more fervent charity. There is no manner of doubt that from
the deathbed of this man who lived a clean, serene life, consecrated
to the humbler duties not less than to the greater, there radiates
the influence of a beautiful example. When such a man could believe
and could live up to his belief and could do so without loss of
intellectual vigor or force and could design and carry out in all
humility achievements irrevocably affecting the destiny of mankind,
how can the rest of us, placed by circumstances in a humbler station
and narrower spheres, puff ourselves up in intellectual pride and
presume to look upon such faith as something the world has long
outgrown? We cannot do it and be honest with ourselves. We cannot
shut our eyes to the fact that such high, calm piety was the very
essence of the character that we all revere. We cannot smile at
the man as presuming to know what was God’s will and arrogating
to himself the right to declare it, for that Mr. McKinley never
did. He only strove to do his best according to his conscience and
trusted that God would, in inscrutable but inevitable ways, bend
His servant’s efforts to the ends which are from everlasting unto
everlasting.
The simplest as the proudest of us
recognize in the popular response to the suggestions emanating from
the death of the President, a sort of renaissance of the religious
spirit. With one accord the multitude took up, as if it were some
new shibboleth, “God’s will be done.” It appeared on all the banners
and wreaths. It was a sort of formula of universal consolation.
It suspired from millions of hearts as the President’s body was
laid away and its firm strong spirit seemed to nerve the country
for the future. “God’s will be done;” so be, we shall do it—all
of us.
In all the public assemblages men
sang “Nearer My God to Thee.” Doing so they felt drawn nearer to
each other. They felt, somehow, that approach to God was God’s will
for all. Their tawdry agnosticism fell away from them. Their cynicism
was smitten by the great example of patience and fortitude and submission
into a glowing spiritual optimism. They found in the spectacle of
a good man dying something that assured them definitely, as an old
pagan said, that “no harm can befall a good man, whether he be alive
or dead.” Their eyes were opened to the inevitable accord of true
faith and good works. Not the wisest of us all could find flaw in
the philosophy of resignation that marked the end of the country’s
chief servant. President McKinley’s religion evoked in the people
the natural religion that too many of us are inclined,in [sic] a
blatant, silly vanity, to deny. This religion knows no sect. It
is the religion upon which all sectarianism is but the embroidery
of men’s reasonings, imaginings and temperaments. It is the religion
that none can evade. It is essential affirmation, the death of negation.
The civilized world sees the effects
of that religion in the pure life that closed triumphantly proclaiming
it. The lesson of that life is thus borne home in a wider and more
ardent acceptance of that religion as giving all of satisfaction
that existence can contain, for the highest as for the lowest, for
the genius as for the dullard. This religion is innocent of fear
and hate. It has its immortal springs in love, its ineffable attainment
in sacrifice, and between these there lie only the requirements
for each of us that we do our duty by ourselves and others, that
we be trustful of the [1][2] purposes
of the Power we feel above us and that we be considerate and kind
evermore.
Against such religion no voice but
one has been raised in all the centuries, and that voice trailed
away in maniacal jabberings in a German madhouse, but a short time
ago. That religion is ideal democracy, idyllic republicanism. It
has for its ultimate, absorption in the Infinite. It moves the world
to-day, as the world was never mov[e]d before, to a recognition
that none of us can do more or better than God’s will, and that
there is no greater destiny, for each or all, than final oneness
with the source of all perfection.
|