Publication information |
Source: Open Court Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “William McKinley” Author(s): Carus, Paul Date of publication: October 1901 Volume number: 15 Issue number: 10 Pagination: 577-78 |
Citation |
Carus, Paul. “William McKinley.” Open Court Oct. 1901 v15n10: pp. 577-78. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (personal response); anarchism (personal response); William McKinley (presidential character). |
Named persons |
James A. Garfield; Abraham Lincoln; William McKinley. |
Document |
William McKinley
MAN’S worst enemy is man. The greatest hindrances to the welfare of the human
race are the errors, the passions, and the evil intentions in the souls of those
that are mentally or morally diseased. President McKinley has been assassinated
in cold blood by the hand of a demented youth! And why? The assassin does not
hate the man, but the office. The President represents social order, law, and
government.
The nation stands aghast at the crime, and the
lover of liberty is perplexed at the problem of how to deal with those unruly
elements who prefer the bullet to the ballot, who spread their doctrines not
by argument but by sowing hatred and inciting to murder, and whose idea of progress
is slaughter and destruction. How liberty shall be benefited by the deed and
how progress can be promoted through the terrorism which the enemies of our
social order try to spread, is incomprehensible; but who can disentangle the
twisted knots of the logic of a fanatic?
America is the land of liberty, but liberty is
possible only by the restriction imposed upon every one through a respect for
the rights of others. Laws are devised for no other purpose than to insure the
liberty of all. We must grant that there are wrong laws, laws which do not serve
this purpose, but the tendency of our national development is toward progress
on the lines of freedom, and there is reason to hope that bad laws will in time
be abrogated. Certainly there is no ground to denounce law itself because some
laws are not right. The greatest hindrance to progress is the false notion that
one can kill ideas or abolish institutions by [577][578]
slaying their representatives. The assassination of kings in Europe has so far
only strengthened the reactionary powers, and the assassination of a president
in America will certainly not weaken the people’s belief in our constitution.
William McKinley became conspicuous by his vigorous
defence of a high tariff, but he would never have risen into national prominence
had not the Democratic party raised the cry for free silver,—a step that would
have led to the deterioration of our money standard. The people’s enthusiasm
for a high tariff is gone, and Mr. McKinley would never have been elected upon
his favorite issue. But when there was the choice between honest money and repudiation,
the people elected him by an overwhelming majority, in spite of his stand on
the tariff.
In his administration President McKinley endeavored
to do his best. It may be granted that he made mistakes, but he felt the responsibility
of his high office, and he grew with the expanse of his duties. We must remember
that new problems offered themselves with the conquest of new territories, and
our administration had to grope its way to find the proper solution. Whatever
enemies Mr. McKinley may have had, partisan hatred, envy, and cavil ceased at
the bedside of the stricken man. Both the North and the South, Republicans and
Democrats, see in him the representative of the nation, and all unite in their
admiration of his courageous behavior in the hour of trial and in the face of
death.
The halo of martyrdom now surrounds his head,
and history will gladly and fully recognise the merits of his administration.
His memory will be kept sacred by the side of his predecessors Abraham Lincoln
and James A. Garfield.