| Current Comment [excerpt]      T marked 
              sorrow that the South has shown over the death of President McKinley 
              has been commented on with surprise in many quarters. The nature 
              and extent of these comments is proof of the fact that the conditions 
              of Southern life and thought are even yet poorly understood away 
              from home. We are still judged as a peculiar sect or tribe, a Nazareth 
              out of which can come little that is good. There are no doubt many 
              reasons—some of them good ones—for this state of things, but it 
              is only fair to say that there has been in the South no expression 
              of sorrow that was not felt. We have not been playing at tears. 
              The grief manifested over the death of our President was sincere, 
              and is a proof of the influence he exercised in the obliteration 
              of party lines and sectional feeling. His kind words, his generous 
              deeds, won the hearts of Southerners as of Northerners, and the 
              recollection of political antagonism faded away in the pride and 
              affection felt for a chief magistrate who was also a gentle, noble, 
              kindly, manly man. But it is also true that President McKinley had 
              a larger number of political supporters in the South than might 
              have been supposed. Quite a number of votes were cast for him both 
              in 1896 and 1900 by men who had usually affiliated with the Democratic 
              party. Some did this openly, some without avowing it; and [247][248] 
              many who did not venture to vote for him rejoiced at his election. 
              The growth of such a sentiment is a hopeful sign. There is always 
              need of a strong class of independent voters in States where one 
              political party is largely in control. In such communities there 
              is no discussion of mooted questions, no attrition of opposing principles, 
              no stimulus to the ruling party to purify itself. A large independent 
              vote of the educated classes is the only way in which party supremacy 
              can be threatened. Too long has it been in some States that the 
              political freedom of a gentleman has meant freedom to vote with 
              only one political party. It was stated privately a few years ago 
              by a political leader that a certain eminent professor would have 
              been elected President of his institution had he not voted for Mr. 
              McKinley in 1896. There is need of a larger number of independent 
              Republicans in Massachusetts and independent Democrats in the South. 
              Our colleges and universities may contribute to this end by creating 
              an atmosphere of personal freedom and independence, by sending forth 
              year by year young men who had rather be right than regular, and 
              who love their country better than the success of any one political 
              party. |