| Publication information | 
| Source: Evening Argus Source type: newspaper Document type: editorial Document title: “Send the Alien Anarchist Back Home Instanter” Author(s): Labouchere, Henry Du Pré City of publication: Owosso, Michigan Date of publication: 7 November 1901 Volume number: 10 Issue number: 93 Pagination: [6] | 
| Citation | 
| Labouchere, Henry Du Pré. “Send the Alien Anarchist Back Home Instanter.” Evening Argus 7 Nov. 1901 v10n93: p. [6]. | 
| Transcription | 
| full text | 
| Keywords | 
| anarchism (international response); anarchism (dealing with). | 
| Named persons | 
| none. | 
| Notes | 
| “By Henry Labouchere, M. P.” (p. [6]). | 
| Document | 
  Send the Alien Anarchist Back Home Instanter
 ANARCHISTS are the enemies of the human race, and the civilization 
  against which they war has a right to suppress them like venomous snakes. But 
  this right, however, does not help us in showing how it can be exercised. It 
  is easy to [say?] that international measures should be taken to protect society 
  against anarchists. But it is not so easy to explain how measures are to be 
  devised which would find international assent.
       A MAN CANNOT BE PUNISHED FOR HIS OPINIONS, according 
  to our view, nor can any collecti[?] of men be punished for enunciating among 
  themselves such opinions. But there are countries in which it is held that they 
  can. Here is the initial difficulty of general action against the anarchist 
  creed in all nations. A criminal opinion only becomes a punishable crime when 
  an individual or an association of individuals confederates together to give 
  effect to it against some other individual.
——————————
     I believe that no international 
  agreement can be arrived at in regard to anarchists, and I should be sorry were 
  we to be a party to one. Each country, however, owes it to the common bond which 
  unites civilized nations to do what it can to put an end to its being used as 
  an asylum from which assassins can plot and carry out their designs against 
  citizens of other countries, whether the victim be a sovereign or the humblest 
  of workmen. So far as countries like the United States are concerned, the only 
  thing that can be done is to strengthen the power of the executive over aliens 
  and, as is usually the case in the United States, over foreigners who have acquired 
  nationality. WITHOUT ANY PROCESS OF EXTRADITION, I SHOULD BE IN FAVOR OF ARMING 
  THE EXECUTIVE WITH POWER TO SHIP OFF ANY ALIEN IN REGARD TO WHOM THERE IS REASONABLE 
  GROUND FOR BELIEVING THAT HE IS AN ANARCHIST AND TO LAND HIM IN THE LAND OF 
  HIS BIRTH, DUE NOTICE HAVING BEEN GIVEN TO THE AUTHORITIES THERE OF HIS ARRIVAL. 
  Beyond this I [?]ould not go one step. We have always been proud of England 
  being an asylum to all who on political grounds are driven out of their own 
  country. It ought still to remain an asylum to those who rightly or wrongly 
  are desirous to secure liberty by revolution in those lands where it does not 
  exist.
       BUT WE MUST NOT HOLD THAT CRIME CEASES TO BE CRIME 
  BECAUSE SOME SCOUNDREL OR FANATIC TELLS US THAT IT IS A POLITICAL PRINCIPLE 
  WITH HIM TO COMMIT IT.
       When aliens admit that they are herded together 
  like oriental thugs to commit murder and when they make our country their home, 
  I see no reason why they should be tolerated. It is only right and proper that 
  they should be expelled.