Publication information |
Source: Great Falls Daily Tribune Source type: newspaper Document type: editorial Document title: “The New President” Author(s): anonymous City of publication: Great Falls, Montana Date of publication: 15 September 1901 Volume number: 15 Issue number: none Pagination: 2 |
Citation |
“The New President.” Great Falls Daily Tribune 15 Sept. 1901 v15: p. 2. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
Theodore Roosevelt (assumption of presidency: personal response); Theodore Roosevelt (criticism); Theodore Roosevelt (political character); Theodore Roosevelt (compared with William McKinley); Roosevelt presidency (predictions, expectations, etc.); anarchism (dealing with); anarchism (government response). |
Named persons |
William McKinley; Theodore Roosevelt. |
Document |
The New President
Theodore Roosevelt has taken the oath of office
and is now president of the United States. He comes to that office under most
sad and unfortunate circumstances; unfortunate even for himself. He has reached
the highest goal of American ambition by an assassin’s bullet, and that of itself
makes the position a harder one for him than if he had been the choice of the
people. He follows a man who has been most successful in the government, and
any false step that he takes will be more noticeable on that account.
There is no need to deny the fact that the American
people are afraid of Roosevelt as a president. They do not relish the change
from the calm and conservative McKinley to the erratic and impetuous Roosevelt.
They believed that the country was safe from avoidable complications and strife
with President McKinley in the chair, and they are not so sure of it with Mr.
Roosevelt there.
There is much that is admirable about Theodore
Roosevelt. His boasted strenuity and his determination “to do things” are strong
points in his favor in ordinary life; but it is more than questionable whether
these traits do not detract from his suitability as a chief executive. The man
who is calm and deliberate is a better man to have at the head of affairs than
he who is aggressive and impetuous. In a fight Roosevelt is strong; he has seemed
at times to love strife for strife’s sake, and it is this trait that today makes
the American people look forward through the next three years with something
akin to fear. McKinley was a man of peace. He shrinked from antagonisms and
differences. With him in the president’s chair all honorable means would have
been exhausted before hope of peace was abandoned.
Still, the responsibilities of the place may tame
even the impetuous Roosevelt. He tells us that he will follow in McKinley’s
footsteps for the maintenance of peace and prosperity. That is what the country
wants at present. It hopes that the new president will remember his words on
this occasion, and that he will be guided by them when his natural impulses
are to hit back harder than he has received.
There is one point in which Roosevelt’s aggressiveness
may stand the country in good stead at the present time. That is in the handling
of the anarchist question. The country is in the mood where it demands no more
temporizing with these outcasts. It wants them taught an effectual lesson. It
wants their claws clipped in such a manner that hereafter official life [will?]
be safe from their dastardly designs. Roosevelt, it is believed, will not shrink
from that task.
Meantime the country will hope for the best from
the new president. He is intrusted [sic] with a responsibility that has gone
to few men so young as he is; that he may merit that responsibility is the wish
of all men, regardless of party, who have the interest of their country at heart.