Publication information |
Source: Statist Source type: newspaper Document type: editorial Document title: “President Roosevelt” Author(s): anonymous City of publication: London, England Date of publication: 21 September 1901 Volume number: 48 Issue number: 1230 Pagination: 515-16 |
Citation |
“President Roosevelt.” Statist 21 Sept. 1901 v48n1230: pp. 515-16. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
Theodore Roosevelt (political character); Roosevelt presidency (predictions, expectations, etc.). |
Named persons |
William McKinley; Theodore Roosevelt. |
Document |
President Roosevelt
T
As already said, amongst the older generation
of Americans there has been some doubt whether the new President might not prove
a little too Imperialist. That he was strongly in favour of the annexation of
the new possessions of the United States is known. And the zeal with which he
threw himself into the war with Spain, while it won for him general popularity,
made the more cautious apprehensive lest he was still too young for the high
place that has been so unexpectedly thrust upon him. The President himself has
taken the best means of disabusing the public of this view. And, indeed, to
the careful foreign observer there has never seemed to be very much ground for
the apprehensions entertained. Vast as are the powers of an American President,
he has to exercise them in accordance with the popular will. Congress has to
vote the moneys necessary to carry out his policy. And the several States have
to support him if he engages in war. An unpopular war, then, is an extremely
difficult thing for any President, whoever he might happen to be. Moreover,
it is difficult to see where at the present time there is any opportunity for
an adventurous policy. The state of Cuba for an entire generation had been such
that sooner or later the intervention of the United States was inevitable. If
Spain, after putting down the insurrection a generation ago, had been able to
win back the loyalty of the Cubans, or even to induce them to acquiesce sullenly
in her rule, it would have been different. But when discontent continued, and
another rebellion broke forth, it was certain that interference must take place
unless the struggle was ended very quickly. It was not ended very quickly, however.
And it looked as if the termination could not be expected for many a year. That
being so, a war between the United States and Spain was almost inevitable. And
once the conflict began the unpreparedness of Spain was revealed to all the
world, and her foreign possessions were rapidly lost. But there is nothing at
present to excite American sympathy or to arouse American impatience at a state
of things seriously hindering their own business affairs. It is incredible that
any American President will without provocation interfere with any South American
Republic. And it is still more incredible that he will pick a quarrel with Europe
or enter upon adventures in Asia. Another outbreak in China might, of course,
lead to unexpected results, though that is exceedingly improbable. On the whole,
even if President Roosevelt were as ambitious for extended territories as those
most opposed to him may choose to think, he must feel that his term of office
will be fully occupied in turning to the best account the new possessions which
have come to the United States. That he will retain these new possessions is
so highly probable that it may be accepted as certain. Indeed, it is difficult
to see how he could get rid of them if he wished to do so. Anything like independence
is impossible in the Philippines, for example, at the present time. And it is
not to be supposed that the United States would hand over the islands to any
other Power. The United States, then, will find that she has to retain what
she won by the sword. And under those circumstances she has to frame a system
of government that will be just to the new possessions and satisfactory to her
own people. In truth, however, there are no real grounds for believing that
President Roosevelt is Imperialist in the sense that he would adopt an aggressive
policy. That he will maintain the honour and the interests of the United States
very firmly, if anybody is so ill-advised as to challenge them, is beyond all
question. But that he will refuse to respect the honour and the interests of
other States there is nothing in his past life to suggest.