Publication information |
Source: Are We Capable of Self-Government? Source type: book Document type: book chapter Document title: “A Business Slow-Down Nation-Wide” [chapter 4] Author(s): Noxon, Frank W. Publisher: Harper and Brothers Publishers Place of publication: New York, New York Year of publication: 1917 Pagination: 48-62 (excerpt below includes only pages 48-49) |
Citation |
Noxon, Frank W. “A Business Slow-Down Nation-Wide” [chapter 4]. Are We Capable of Self-Government? New York: Harper and Brothers, 1917: pp. 48-62. |
Transcription |
excerpt of chapter |
Keywords |
William McKinley (last public address); William McKinley (presidential policies); United States (economic system); McKinley assassination (impact on economy). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz; William McKinley. |
Notes |
From title page: Are We Capable of Self-Government?: National Problems
and Policies Affecting Business, 1900-1916.
From title page: With an Introduction by Harry A. Wheeler, First President of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States. |
Document |
A Business Slow-Down Nation-Wide [excerpt]
THE struggle in New England was only a provincial phase of a
larger condition. The same problem was the national problem. For the nation
the commercial competitor was foreign. William McKinley, in his antemortem speech
in 1901, had declared that continued prosperity for the Republic required outlets
abroad for manufactures. Prophet of high tariffs for development of the “home
market,” intimate personal and political associate of thick-and-thin protectionists,
Mr. McKinley came to recognize that the United States had crossed the line into
the class of nations which produce more manufactures than they can consume.
Protection, he believed, had had its perfect work. “The era of exclusiveness,”
he said, “is past.” He pointed the way across the seas. America must buy abroad
if her foreign customers were to be put in position to take her products; imports
must be freer.
Judging by the past, any obstruction to this program
would come from Mr. McKinley’s former associates and disciples of the protection
camp not yet converted to his new policy. Since the Civil War [48][49]
down to 1901 industrial and mercantile interests had sat at the head of the
council board. Indeed, protectionists were active in blocking, after he was
gone, the new plan proposed at Buffalo by the doomed President, their former
leader. Obstruction, however, was by no means confined to business men who disagreed
with McKinley. Predictions based upon past contests left out of account an entirely
new condition. Controversy had thitherto waged between schools of business thought.
The champions now were ethical leaders against business leaders. Czolgosz struck
down not only McKinley, but the intense solicitude for material prosperity which
McKinley represented. Moral and altruistic issues, long in the seed, had come
to fruit. The air was filled no longer with demands that the transportation
and business interests, sitting at the head of the table, should cause the government
to adopt this or that policy affecting business. What people insisted upon was
that these interests should not sit at the head or at the table at all.