| Third Year in Rome—Close of Diplomatic Service 
              [excerpt]       In September, 1901, 
              came the murder of President McKinley, and owing to my peculiar 
              relations with him, as well as with King Humbert, who was also murdered 
              by an anarchist, my remarks at a memorial service may not be out 
              of place.  
               
                     “Ladies and Gentlemen: The sorrows 
                  of this occasion come home to me to-day with peculiar force, 
                  for, as you know, for three and one half years I was the accredited 
                  representative of this country to the court of Rome, on the 
                  credentials of President McKinley, and was received as ambassador 
                  by King Humbert of Italy. A year ago news came to us that King 
                  Humbert had been foully murdered by an anarchist. To-day we 
                  come here to mourn the death of our martyred President, also 
                  murdered by one of these enemies of the human race.“Two weeks ago to-morrow the President 
                  of the United States, William McKinley, was shot by an anarchist 
                  with a name unpronounceable by an Anglo-Saxon tongue, and a 
                  week later he died from the effect of the assassin’s bullet. 
                  When wounded he was in the act of receiving his fellow citizens 
                  and extending to them, as they came forward one after another, 
                  a shake of the hand,—the greeting of man to man. He was no despot, 
                  but a constitutional President, elected by a large majority 
                  of the voters of this country of universal suffrage, and respected 
                  and beloved by substantially all who voted against him. He was 
                  not an autocrat, but a man who sought to know the views of the 
                  people whom he served as Chief Magistrate, so that he might 
                  as nearly as possible carry them into effect. If he was open 
                  to criticism it was on the ground that he was too anxious in 
                  this direction. He was not an aristocrat but a plain man of 
                  the people, plain in origin and in manner of life up to the 
                  time of assuming his high office, and his sympathies were ever 
                  with those of humble position and [331][332] 
                  small means, rather than with the wealthy and fashionable classes. 
                  Personally he was without enemies. Everyone who met him was 
                  impressed with his friendliness and sympathy, as well as his 
                  desire to do exactly what he believed to be right.
 “Why was such a man the target 
                  for a murderer’s bullet? The assassin had no personal grievance, 
                  either real or imaginary; and no pretence is made, even by those 
                  of anarchistic faith, that he was a tyrant or oppressor, whose 
                  death would avenge the sufferings of his victims. The ordinary 
                  motives for assassination, even of crowned heads, were lacking,—I 
                  speak of motives which governed men up to recent years. Within 
                  the present generation, however, a new sect has arisen which 
                  may be compared to the thugs of India, except that it is worse, 
                  as the thug deals with ordinary men, and the anarchist with 
                  the representatives of organized society. The anarchists are 
                  the enemies of all who believe in law or order or government 
                  of any kind, and they promulgate their views by assassination 
                  and the fear of assassination. If ordinary society desires to 
                  protect itself, these worse than wild beasts must be properly 
                  dealt with, and our best legal minds should grapple with the 
                  problem how this is practically to be done.
 “But to return to our President, 
                  whom we mourn to-day. He was a shining example of the high results 
                  of our American institutions. Born, as before said, in humble 
                  circumstances, with limited opportunity for education, he worked 
                  his way by his substantially unaided merit to the highest position 
                  in the land. In any other country the accident of birth, the 
                  lack of fortune, and, at the start, of influential friends, 
                  would have kept him in the background. Here there is opportunity 
                  for those, who can do, to find work suitable to their talents, 
                  and William McKinley, like Abraham Lincoln, came to the front 
                  by sheer force of ability and character. As a youth of eighteen, 
                  when the call came for soldiers, he responded and enlisted as 
                  a private soldier. Carrying a gun in the ranks at the beginning, 
                  he performed his duty so well that he rose from grade to grade, 
                  and came home as major of his regiment. In civil life the same 
                  results followed his faithful service. Commencing in minor public 
                  office, he became district attorney of his county, then a Member 
                  of Congress, then chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, 
                  then Governor of his State, then President. Institutions that 
                  permit careers like this are those that the anarchist seeks 
                  to destroy in the pretended interest of the people. [332][333]
 “He was probably the most popular 
                  President since Abraham Lincoln, popular because he possessed 
                  the qualities of heart which brought him close to the ordinary 
                  man, as well as those of mind which stamped him as a great statesman. 
                  His death, no less than his life, will endear him to posterity, 
                  who will count him high among the martyrs for constitutional 
                  liberty.”
 |