Publication information |
Source: Eclectic Review Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “The Critics” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: 15 October 1901 Volume number: 4 Issue number: 10 Pagination: 312 |
Citation |
“The Critics.” Eclectic Review 15 Oct. 1901 v4n10: p. 312. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
William McKinley (medical care: criticism: personal response); William McKinley (medical care); William McKinley (medical condition). |
Named persons |
Matthew D. Mann. |
Document |
The Critics
How easy it is to sit miles away, read reports
in the lay-press and the criticise the men in attendance upon an important case—theorize
and philosophize—how different the responsibility and anxiety of actual attendance.
The assassination of our beloved President brought
us face to face with such a situation. Who but those in actual attendance can
realize the difficulties and complications. From the full report of the case
and the report of the autopsy it is clearly shown that all was done, and that
promptly, that our knowledge and the art and science of surgery could suggest.
The promptness and skill with which Dr. Mann performed the operation must be
regarded with pride by the profession, and the unhappy termination was due to
no lack of skill or good judgment on the part of those who had charge of his
case. The President’s age, his sedentary life, the heavy burdens and responsibilities
of his position had devitalized his system so that the injured tissues did not
have vitality enough to heal. From the report of the autopsy we gather that
there was no Peritonitis, no pus, no sign of inflammation; simply Necrosis and
non-union in all the tissues in the neighborhood of the bullet track.