Publication information |
Source: Union Boot and Shoe Worker Source type: journal Document type: editorial Document title: “High Priced Cheap Labor” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: October 1901 Volume number: 2 Issue number: 10 Pagination: 5 |
Citation |
“High Priced Cheap Labor.” Union Boot and Shoe Worker Oct. 1901 v2n10: p. 5. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (personal response); economic system (impact on society). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz. |
Document |
High Priced Cheap Labor
Who is responsible for the killing of the President?
Perhaps the steadfast patrons and importers of
so-called cheap foreign labor.
So-called cheap labor has some drawbacks. Labor
is supposed to be cheap in the country to which Czolgosz belongs, though really
it isn’t, but merely laborers’ time that is cheap. Other things are cheap there,
among them human life. This supposedly cheap labor and cheapness of human life
are generally found together.
What will it profit to hire a man for ten cents
a day if every time he has a grievance he will attempt assassination as the
only remedy?
In countries like Russia and Italy, where wages
are miserable and liberty most curtailed, the people regard violence as the
only way to secure relief.
In countries like the United States, England,
France and Germany, particularly the two former, the people depend upon agitation,
public opinion, labor organization, the ballot, etc.
Abuses must be remedied in some way. It is a matter
of choice. If labor organizations with arbitration, or strikes, are not liked,
employers can frequently engage workmen who do not understand or practice such
methods but who do understand and practice violence.
Some employers do this, and many of them who have,
do not know how near they have sometimes been to the assassin’s knife. The American
workmen, who have worked alongside these people in some sections of the country,
know far better than manufacturers the chances which the latter have taken[.]
Some people are so over-anxious to “make a dollar”
that they will risk getting their throats cut. To take such chances for the
sake of employing men who are only apparently cheap is indeed foolish. The daily
wage they get is low enough, but the daily service they render is more than
correspondingly small.
We have secured a lot of this sort of cheap labor
and have lost a president, and the people who make the loudest pretences [sic]
of sorrow, and call most loudly for something being done to prevent such an
occurrence in the future will immediately proceed to encourage the importation
of more of this exceedingly high priced so-called cheap labor[.]