Publication information |
Source: Challenge Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “The Assassination of the President” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: 21 September 1901 Volume number: none Issue number: 38 Pagination: 8 |
Citation |
“The Assassination of the President.” Challenge 21 Sept. 1901 n38: p. 8. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (personal response: socialists); socialism; McKinley assassination (public response: criticism); anarchism (dealing with). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz; William McKinley. |
Notes |
Authorship of the editorial (below) is not credited in the magazine.
Likely, though, the author is H. Gaylord Wilshire.
As in the original source, the word society is spelled below both with and without the initial letter upper cased. |
Document |
The Assassination of the President
I, in common with all other Socialists, deplore
the assassination of President McKinley. A man making an assault on the head
of the nation is like a fool attempting to guide a horse by beating him over
the head with a club. There are wrongs in our social system, but if there is
any one thing the philosophy of Socialism teaches us it is that no individual
is to blame for either the existence of such wrongs or for their perpetuation.
Modern society is like a youth stupidly trying to continue wearing his outgrown
boy’s clothes and refusing to put on the new suit laid ready for him to wear.
The boy’s suit is uncomfortably tight and fails to protect half his body, yet
he is so foolishly conservative that he will make no change.
Society is ready to-day to change her outgrown
capitalistic garments for the Socialistic ones, all ready laid out and waiting
her. But while she is ready economically, she is not so intellectually. To make
the final change she must either be convinced intellectually or forced physically.
The forcing can only be done by the growth of Society breaking asunder the capitalistic
garments and making the clinging on to them absolutely impossible. However,
waiting for this event is slow work. It may take five or six years anyway. Hence
the natural impatience of man induces the Socialist to try and shorten this
wait by persuading society to make the change at once.
Hence it is seen that violence or force has no
place in the program of the Socialist. He is a “persuader,” pure and simple.
If there is any forcing to be done he leaves that job to Dame Nature.
The mission of the Socialist is to prepare society
for an inevitable change and so to prevent dangerous and stupid resistance of
a natural and irresistible evolutionary development.
There is heard a great outcry on all sides for
what is generally called the suppression of anarchy, and particularly is the
idea set forth that the great remedy lies in the restriction of immigration.
It would seem superfluous to point out that there is no practical method of
looking into an immigrant’s mind at Ellis Island and determining his political
beliefs, for we may be sure that no anarchist wishing to land will avow his
sentiments if he knows the avowal will bar him. In the case of the present assassin
the examiner would have had to have decided against admitting his parents thirty-five
years ago and seven years before he had been privileged to be born in this free
and enlightened country. Czolgosz, it must be remembered, is but twenty-eight,
and his parents had been in this country seven years before he was born. It
is also to be remarked that none of his family nor their associates have any
affiliation or sympathy with anarchism, or Socialism either, for that matter.
It would seem self-evident, in his case at least, that his anarchism was of
purely American growth. There is no use of our hugging the delusion that there
is no soil in this country fit to sprout the germ of anarchy. The facts are
stronger than any theory. The anarchist is here and is a force to be reckoned
with. That it is to the interest of society that he be suppressed, both capitalist
and Socialist are for the once in agreement. They only differ as to the best
method to do the suppressing. The problem reduced to its simplest form is: “How
are we going to prevent the assassination of our Presidents by men who, though
more or less insane, are yet ingenious enough to override the ordinary obstacles
placed against the accomplishment of such a crime?” Against the murdering of
the ordinary citizen, who cannot have a company of soldiers surrounding him
at all hours, there is but one protection, namely, the punishment of the offender.
But when it comes to defending one’s self against a lunatic, that has no care
for his own life, then the case is different. There is no use of reasoning that
this is a free country and that as long as men have a free press, free speech
and the ballot there is no reason for any sane man to advocate assassination.
This argument falls flat when the answer is that it is not the sane but the
insane that must be guarded against.
The whole amount of the matter is that it is quite
probable the exalted office of a popularly elected presidency is in itself a
dangerously inviting target for the half-witted. There is no use arguing with
the night moth that singes his wings against your candle. The light is such
an irresistible attraction to him that he will give up his life rather than
not fly into it. There is but one remedy for the moth—either enclose the light
and bar him out or blow out the candle. Yes, there is one other remedy—wait
till daylight breaks. This last is really the Socialist plan. When we have Socialism
every man will be in such comfort and luxury that the chief executive of the
nation will be so inconspicuous by contrast that he will not be the mark for
the assassin-lunatic he is to-day.