Publication information |
Source: Freedom Source type: magazine Document type: editorial column Document title: “Notes” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: October 1901 Volume number: 15 Issue number: 161 Pagination: 56 |
Citation |
“Notes.” Freedom Oct. 1901 v15n161: p. 56. |
Transcription |
excerpt |
Keywords |
society (criticism); McKinley assassination (international response: anarchists). |
Named persons |
William Archer; Thomas Henry Huxley; William McKinley. |
Notes |
Omission of text within the excerpt below is indicated with a bracketed indicator (e.g., [omit]). |
Document |
Notes [excerpt]
V
Society is guilty of murder—cold, cruel, deliberate
murder. It announces the fact itself, and makes no amends for the crime[.] It
officially notifies the number of its victims, and in the next breath hypocritically
eulogises the murderous machinery—the capitalist state—that has accomplished
those assassinations. Fifty-three deaths from starvation in London in one year
(1900) of course only account for those whose fate the Home Office is bound
to acknowledge. In reality a whole army of unfortunate victims of the present
social organisation perish every year from starvation indirectly; for Huxley
told us years ago that there was a complete list of diseases due entirely to
lack of sufficient food. This is true; but when it comes to tracing the cause
of these tragedies there is none but the Anarchists, the Socialists, and a handful
of reformers who dare face the situation, and tell society in plain language
that every man and woman who heedlessly permits these things to go on without
protest is responsible for these deaths, and all those who uphold the present
system for the gratification of their idle, vain lives and base ambitions, are
the enemies of their kind. We will quote some remarks from the Daily News
and the Star which may help “respectable,” law-abiding people to understand
why even kings, emperors and presidents sometimes become “victims” to the wild
justice of revenge which our present society constantly provokes. The Daily
News says:—“In this grim form that ancient wail of the forsaken and abandoned
rises to us who sit at ease. We recommend the close perusal of this brief document
to those excellent bewildered persons who have of late been seeking round for
the cause of the spread of Anarchism. When men become outcasts and die in the
street, some of them, like dying dogs, will bite before they die. . . . . .
. . . Here indeed is a fairly serious indictment against our civilisation. In
the midst of the richest city in the world, in a year of unexampled prosperity,
over fifty, men, women and children died of literal starvation and exposure.”
And the Star: “‘Tragedy,’ says Mr. William Archer, ‘is a massage of the
emotions.’ Yet these tragedies do not massage our emotions to any great extent.
We all prefer to forget and ignore the ugly side of life—until a Czolgosz thrusts
it in our face.”
[omit]
C
Just lately there has been a little fluttering
of the official conscience in St. Pancras, owing to the outbreak of small-pox
in that parish, and the sanitary inspector reports a hundred cases of families
living in underground cellars, with scarcely any light or air and rack-rented
to the last farthing by inhuman monsters calling themselves landlords. The Daily
News compares these wretches to man-eating tigers, and we are not going
to quarrel with the comparison. But the Daily News should be careful
in its remarks about the conduct of the propertied classes. Such epithets nowadays
are only allowable when speaking of Anarchists; in that case the more bloodthirsty
the remark the more it will be appreciated by the sainted souls who pretend
to be horrified at the assassination of one man, whilst revelling [sic]
in the assassination of a whole nation.
Many of these unfortunate victims of landlordism
are dying a harder and a slower death than McKinley. But who will weep for them?
What paper will go in mourning on their account? Who will trouble to bring the
assassin to justice?
——————————
In the foregoing “Notes” we have remarked upon a few of the more prominent features of a social war which is being waged every minute of every day in every year, and in all parts of the world where capitalism exists. Suddenly or slowly its victims die by tens of thousands, by “accidents,” by slow poison, by starvation. But it happens once in a hundred thousand times that the victim in this war is the head of a state. Then dismay seizes on the priestly gang, and a cry for blood goes up against those who recognise this social war, boldly point to its cause, and demand that it shall be ended by overthrowing the present system and replacing it with bread, liberty, and justice, for all.