Publication information |
Source: Gunton’s Magazine Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “The Problem of Anarchy” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: October 1901 Volume number: 21 Issue number: 4 Pagination: 301-02 |
Citation |
“The Problem of Anarchy.” Gunton’s Magazine Oct. 1901 v21n4: pp. 301-02. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
anarchism (dealing with). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz. |
Document |
The Problem of Anarchy
As we have said, the execution of Czolgosz will be neither adequate
reparation for the crime nor protection for the future. The real problem, which
ought now to receive determined and unremitting attention, is how to protect
our institutions from this destructive menace of anarchism which has operated
so successfully in European countries in recent years and found so firm a foothold
here. The air is full of suggestions for drastic remedies, and calls for vengeance,
but the problem is not to be solved so readily. In protecting liberty, we must
not go so far as to destroy it. In driving out anarchism, we must not erect
into law a policy and methods which later and in other directions can be perverted
into instruments of oppression. We are compelled by the very nature of our institutions
to draw the line between liberty and license. We must preserve the rights of
free speech and free assemblage as necessary safeguards against despotism, but
we must also protect ourselves against such of the results of this liberty as
tend to destroy the only adequate guarantee of liberty itself—that is, government
and law.
The problem is more serious for us than for any
other nation. On the one hand, the United States is becoming more and more an
asylum for anarchistic propagandists driven from Europe, and, on the other,
our constitution will not let us use the radically drastic measures so easily
available in a monarchy. Anarchy [301][302] is
bred under despotic conditions utterly unlike anything to be found in this country,
but when the anarchist arrives here and sees the forms of government still in
evidence, knowing nothing of the difference in its character and operation from
that he left behind, he takes advantage of the freer environment to strike the
blows he sought to strike at home. Because of his embittering experience under
one type of government, and ignorance of our own, our very freedom from despotic
restrictions places us at his mercy. Therefore, in his case, we cannot rely
on the broad general safeguards which are ample to secure law and order with
those brought up under our own institutions and conditions. Special measures
become absolutely essential to meet the special danger.