| Publication information | 
| Source: Socialist Spirit Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “God’s Way” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: October 1901 Volume number: 1 Issue number: 2 Pagination: 11-12 | 
| Citation | 
| “God’s Way.” Socialist Spirit Oct. 1901 v1n2: pp. 11-12. | 
| Transcription | 
| full text | 
| Keywords | 
| McKinley assassination (religious interpretation: criticism); society (criticism). | 
| Named persons | 
| Leon Czolgosz; William McKinley. | 
| Document | 
  God’s Way
     The spirit of true inquiry can never be justly 
  charged with disrespect toward anything, however much it may be resented by 
  those who unconsciously substitute feeling for thinking. We make progress only 
  as we subject our impulses of whatever nature to keen intellectual review. The 
  dynamic for right action finds its source in feeling. The intellect may be likened 
  to the pilot which seeks out the true direction. Hence there is no irreverence 
  in the attempt to analyze the phrase which has been caught up and repeated with 
  the object of emphasizing the deep religious nature of the late President.
       Pietism is the acceptance and public observance 
  of conventional notions regarding the deity. Religion is the right relations 
  between men, indicated to the individual soul in moments of communion with the 
  source of spirit life;—whatever that source may be. Religion and pietism may 
  sometimes conflict. At any rate, they are never the same thing.
       Under these definitions it is clear from the late 
  President’s words and actions that he was a pious rather than a religious man. 
  In this he was at one with the great middle-class of Americans.
       “It is God’s way,” applied to death by assassination, 
  is to a truly religious nature highly revolting. It is to think very meanly 
  of God to attribute the act of Czolgosz to His will.
       If the American people believe that the assassination 
  of President McKinley was God’s will, why do they put Czolgosz to death? Do 
  they wish to express their official disapproval of the will of God?
       Ignorance is always blind to its own absurdity.
       It is quite evident that the people do not recognize 
  the significance of President McKinley’s pious phrase, however much they have 
  exploited it and printed it on his photographs. President McKinley himself would 
  have been puzzled to explain just what he meant. We are so unaccustomed to using 
  our brains in religious matters,—as if ignorance were God’s and intelligence 
  were the devil’s domain,—that we have fallen into a kind of fatalism. We unconsciously 
  attribute everything which happens to God’s will,—just because it happens. This 
  relieves us of the obligation to help God to make a better world. What’s the 
  use, if everything which happens is ordained to happen?
       It is this fatalism which makes it seem God’s 
  will for us to murder the Filipinos, and prevents our recognition of the fact 
  that we are thinking of God as a creature of animal passions and clouded intellect 
  when we put him into partnership with the military and with Czolgosz.
       We really must use our reason now and then.
       Nature expresses God’s will, if anything does. 
  The tree lives its appointed time; so does the flower; so does the dog, and 
  so should man.
       The earth, our common mother, is perfectly adapted 
  to human life. In its resources resides everything that can make for comfort, 
  for beauty, and for happiness. If we were to stop fighting one another and administer 
  the bounties of nature for the common good, soul-growth would become possible. 
  We would soon grow ashamed of our fatalism then, and recognize that we have 
  [11][12] been blaming God for things which it lies 
  in our will to abolish.
       The soul aspires as soon as the requisite physical 
  wants are satisfied. It is waste time for well-disposed preachers to try saving 
  the souls of hungry men. One cannot appreciate the music on a passing steamer 
  if he happens to be swimming for his life.
       We assume by our actions that God is a niggard; 
  that there is not enough for us all. Then to avoid the logical odium of our 
  wrong assumptions, we take refuge in a vulgar fatalism, giving to the deity 
  the instincts and attributes of the assassin.
       We are very foolish people.
       God would grow fruit enough along the American 
  country roads to feed the world if we would plant the trees.
       We had rather grow weeds, and listen to the cries 
  of starving children, and hug the devil-worship we call religion.
       Really God is very patient. Perhaps He hopes we 
  may yet come to our senses. He has been waiting a long time. He might make progress 
  by sweeping the earth clean and beginning again:—say with dogs. Dogs do not 
  oppress each other. Only men do that. The more one sees of men the better one 
  likes dogs.
       It seems such folly, such an awful waste of life 
  energy,—if life really has any value,—to exploit and bully one another, when 
  all nature waits to be conquered. We have only touched the outer garments of 
  such giants as electricity.
       This is really God’s way:—to make the world a 
  decent place to live in; to abolish economic fear; to enable men to do right, 
  not in the pietistic sense, which is stupid, but in the religious sense, which 
  is god-like.
       We can stop breeding assassins if we really want 
  to. No one enjoys being an assassin.
       We must look a little more carefully after the 
  downmost man.
       Perhaps when we do this we shall find a nobler 
  idea of God. “Unto the least of these,” we used to think He said.