Publication information |
Source: Universal Brotherhood Path Source type: magazine Document type: article Document title: “Anarchy: A Living Question” Author(s): D., G. Date of publication: November 1901 Volume number: 16 Issue number: 8 Pagination: 421-28 |
Citation |
D., G. “Anarchy: A Living Question.” Universal Brotherhood Path Nov. 1901 v16n8: pp. 421-28. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
anarchism (religious response); anarchism (religious interpretation); McKinley assassination (religious response); religion. |
Named persons |
Helena P. Blavatsky; William Q. Judge; William McKinley; Katherine Tingley. |
Document |
Anarchy: A Living Question
THE subject that has most deeply affected the
public mind during the past month is, of course, the assassination of our late
President. We find ourselves compelled to pause and think. What does it indicate
as to the past? What does it signify as to the future? We are face to face with
a great problem.
Time was when many would have felt the assassination
to be in some measure atoned by the death of the assassin. No one feels so today.
His trial, conviction and all that have followed during the current month are
disagreeable contingencies which do not in any degree solve the real problem,
but in fact, make it harder to solve. In spite of current talk of changed legislation
with regard to anarchy, more stringent laws as to immigration, treason, etc.,
deep, deep beneath all this chatter there is in the national heart a conviction
that these man-made laws will avail little, that we must begin to understand
and follow the Higher Law. There is a growing conviction that all this calamity
is “God’s will” and that any remedy which leaves out of the question the Higher
Law or God, will be no remedy at all.
What is the meaning of this expression, “It is
God’s will”? Not at all what it meant a hundred or even twenty-five years ago.
For we have to thank the Dark Ages for a degrading ideal of God,—an arbitrary
being who dwells outside of the Universe, ruling it in an arbitrary way, yet
who may, by prayers, be induced to confer certain penalties or benefits. [421][422]
Today there has sprung up in the hearts of many
an unshakable trust in Law as the basis of all the processes of nature and of
life. With it we find a higher conception of God, the Causeless Cause of all
that is, informing and permeating all things, stone and atom as well as man,
the One Life of which all nature is but the garment and expression.
In the words of the Bhagavad-Gita: “Understand
that all things are in me even as the mighty air which passes everywhere is
in space. . . . . . I am the father and mother of this Universe, the grandsire
and the preserver. I am the goal, the comforter, the Lord, the Witness, the
resting place, the asylum and the Friend. I am the origin and the dissolution,
the receptacle, the store-house and the eternal seed. . . . . . I am the cause
unseen and the visible effect.”
One who builds on a true conception of God is
certain to think, certain to look below the plane of effects to that of causes.
And there is every sign that throughout the nation there is coming to birth
a deeper trust in God, a more abiding refuge in the Great Law of cause and effect.
That is the assurance that this problem of anarchy, which has faced every nation
of the Old World and so far has not been solved by any of them, this problem
of which we are reminded by the recent assassination, will probably be solved
by us.
The fact is, the entire current of the world’s
thought has been changed. And if we will examine the various theories and doctrines
that have been given to the world during the last fifty years, it will be plain
that we owe this to H. P. Blavatsky. She was the first messenger in this cycle
of a true philosophy of life, a truer and diviner conception of God, a conception
of the Higher Law as the basis and the dispenser of all that is.
When she came she found humanity apathetic, unlighted.
She brought it a philosophy of hope and of inspiration which has come to so
permeate our mental atmosphere that many who may never have heard of her or
of Theosophy as a specific doctrine, have felt a new light enter their lives
and have found a fresh courage to go on and fight the battle out along higher
lines. This is true because H. P. Blavatsky spoke to the soul of humanity and
soul is one. Because she brought to us higher ideals of life and conduct and
then proved them practical and true by a philosophy which is unassailable. She
did what no other World Teacher has been able to do in centuries, she builded
a bridge between the actual and the ideal, and over that bridge all humanity
is one day destined to pass.
And that is why, with regard to the many problems
that confront us, we are more honest than in the past. We used to think that,
whether we did our share or not, evolution, somehow, would go on just the same.
Today we realize that we are not separate from humanity or from the world and
that we cannot pass into a higher grade or evolutionary state until we have
solved the problems and passed all the examinations that pertain to this one.
Our souls realize this even though our brains may not and that is why there
is something within us that compels us to think and think and think over this
prob- [422][423] lem of anarchy. How shall we reach
the hearts of the lawless, the jealous, the discontented? How shall we teach
them that law cannot be abolished, that this is a law-governed universe with
chaos as the only alternative, and that it is only by the help of the wise Law
that the soul is able to lift the self to higher planes. How shall we teach
them that all men are brothers, because all come from the same Absolute Source?
How shall we lead them to understand that all the pain and disappointment of
their own lives is but the result of past deeds, if not in this life then in
another, that God is not mocked and that whatsoever a man soweth that shall
he also reap. How shall we transform an element which today would destroy our
civilization into an element that would desire to be a help to it and a part
of it?
What is anarchy? The two Greek words of which
it is composed mean “without a Leader.” To us it signifies a total absence of
government, total lawlessness. Those who believe in the Divine Order of things,
who believe that the Universe and all that is sprang from the very bosom of
the Infinite Law, realize what complete chaos would exist under a reign of anarchy.
Imagine for a moment that the Solar system should abandon all law and whirl
into anarchy. What would become of us? Suppose the seasons of the year should
break the laws which govern them and vouchsafe to us a spring six months long
and no harvest time at all, for two or three years? The people of the earth
would starve. Suppose the law of gravity should become inoperative. Yet the
same laws operate in the world of mind and soul, unseen, yet swifter, more far-reaching
in action, more terrible in the penalties that befall those who break them.
It is inconceivable that there are those who would sweep them aside. Yet there
are such.
But the beauty of it is that the Great Law is
stronger than the caprices of any person or collection of persons. Its march
cannot be stayed. Such a thing as anarchy is a simply impossibility. Yet, while
it is true that a state of anarchy simply could not exist, we have had in our
western states, at times, conditions that approached it. In California, during
the rush which followed the “gold fever” in ’49, hundreds of mining camps sprung
up in isolated districts in a very short time. At first, in some of these, there
was a condition bordering on anarchy,—no Leader, no head, no government, each
man for himself. But this did not last. Disease, crime and horror soon taught
these men a sharp lesson. In no long time, invariably, the Leader appeared and
organized his followers in the interests of law and order. Though the earliest
of such organizations was not on a particularly high plane, though they were
agents of much that was unjust and unwise—the very fact that these “Vigilance
Committees” recognized the function and office of Leader, indicates that they
were the first step toward good government. It also indicates that even reckless
men prefer a Leader and a Law—though the Leader may be untrustworthy and the
Law fallible,—to anarchy.
The anarchists have very much to say of freedom.
Yet their ideal of freedom differs greatly from the Theosophical ideal. And
to understand the lat- [423][424] ter one must
go back to the soul, the source of all. For the soul is the fundamental proposition.
The ancient Wisdom Religion, today known as Theosophy, is the eternal, primeval
Doctrine of the Soul. For the World-Saviors have always taught that the soul
is the real man, and the brain and body are but the garment he wears, the instrument
he uses. Just as the sunbeam is of one light and substance with the Sun, its
parent, so the Soul is of the essence of God, the Absolute Source of all that
is and ever will be. Thus, born of God as the sunbeam is born of the Sun, the
soul descends into earth life and clothes itself with matter, that is, with
the bodies it builds and uses. And the purpose of the soul in thus permeating
and informing matter, has ever been to lift and spiritualize and purify matter,
to lift it into a freedom as absolute as that of the soul itself. “Compassion
is the Law of Laws, Alaya’s Self,” and this gives us the key to the process.
Freedom is the Soul’s heritage, and the acts of
the Soul are followed by no penalties, only by rewards. But our lower tendencies
concern themselves mainly with self-indulgence. The elemental self never goes
out in compassion, but, unless the soul prevents, it turns continually in on
itself, a suicidal method. The very fact that the lower nature, if allowed to
act unguided by the Soul, brings upon itself penalty after penalty is proof
that it is not working with the Higher Law, but against it.
Thus the Soul’s task is not easy and no doubt
the elemental self often believes itself to be under a hard task-master. For
the pricking of conscience which is the voice of the Soul often prevents a man
from following the bent of his desires or appetites. Yet if he obeys the Soul’s
still voice, is he less free or more so? Has he not by that very yielding to
the Higher Law made a step upwards toward true freedom? For freedom is not a
state wherein one may break all laws with impunity but a state in which the
man works in such perfect harmony with the Great Law that he becomes verily
one with it.
Most of us do not find our freedom interfered
with by the law against stealing. Yet the criminal does. And yet the laws upon
our statute books are very fallible, at best but an outward and inadequate expression
of the Higher Law. For the Higher Law is that of the Soul, unseen in workings
but swift and sure in results, needing no detectives, no police, no executioners,
for, as has been said, it contains within itself its own executioner.
It seems strange that there are those who cannot
distinguish between true freedom, perfect harmony with the Soul, and a licensing
of appetite and desire. But there are such, a fact which can only be explained
because man’s nature is dual. Within each heart is the angel and the demon,
one seeking to lift man into true freedom, the other seeking ever to pull him
down into the slavery of appetite or some selfish desire. If the man centers
his consciousness in the lower, the process of being brought into harmony with
the Soul is certain to be very uncomfortable and even terrible. It may be that
the lower nature will utterly rebel and then the man will sink back into darkness
and the Soul will leave him to his own devices. For this the Teacher must always
do when his [424][425] pupil refuses to learn,
and the Soul is the Teacher of the personality.
But the wise man will lift his consciousness to
the plane of soul, will endeavor, in spite of continual failure, to keep it
always at its highest point and will be thankful that the Great Law has hedged
his lower nature around with laws and penalties. For without these helps the
soul could never lift it.
We do not need fewer laws, we need more. We need
to know more and not less of the Higher Law. We need to discover new phases,
new applications of it as diligently as may be. Then, if we have the will and
the perseverance to bring the lower nature into harmony with it, we shall be
free, gods actually, creators. That is the theosophical ideal of freedom.
It is not strange that anarchists have a perverted
idea of freedom. “God! I don’t believe in God,” are the words of one of their
exponents. “The first thing anarchists have to do is to destroy every altar,
extinguish every religion and tear God from the heavens.” This then, is the
basis upon which they build, a basis of nothing at all, of denial.
It is not strange that they advocate the extermination
of rulers, the very doctrine which incited the assassin to commit this crime.
Yet these who taught him shrink away from him and say: “He is not one of us.
He does not distinguish between violent anarchy and philosophical anarchy. Certainly
we teach these doctrines, but only theoretically.”
Do we need anything more to enable us to place
doctrines of this stamp where they belong,—in the realm of confusion and of
the shades. This age has no use for anything that is merely theoretical. It
demands that theories be proven, be made practical or abandoned. And there is
something grimly humorous in the spectacle of a group of people endeavoring
to gain our respect for their doctrines on the plea that they are merely theoretical!
Today, those who believe in theosophy and the
theosophical movement are prouder of nothing than that every principle of this
wisdom religion is practical and that the Universal Brotherhood stands before
the world today as a practical organization and not a collection of dreamers.
Another truth is brought to our minds forcibly
at this time by the statements of the assassin and his associates: “Why should
we grieve at the death of the President? His death is of no more consequence
than that of a common laborer.”
We are shocked at this expression because our
souls remember, though perchance our brains do not, that ancient doctrine that
humanity is a vast organism, having its head, its heart, its ganglionic centres,
its innumerable conscious cells, each with its own function to perform. That
this knowledge inheres in the soul is proven by our commonest expressions, “the
public pulse,” “the public conscience,” “the public mind,” “the national heart;”
another proof that H. P. Blavatsky did not bring us new doctrines, but came
to remind us of old truths which, somehow, we had forgotten. And the truth that
humanity is a living, pulsating organism and not a mere collection of isolated
fragments, is one of the basic principles of Theosophy. [425][426]
In degree, therefore, is our nation an organism
and our President, on outer planes, functions as its head and heart, a centre
of force, guiding, holding all together. Therefore the assault upon our President
is as much more serious in its consequences than an assault upon an ordinary
citizen, as an injury to the brain or heart is more serious in its effects upon
the physical body than a similar injury to one of the extremities. It has been
well characterized as “A stab at the Heart of American liberty.” Whether our
President was wise or unwise scarcely enters the question, from this point of
view. That he had both wisdom and goodness is our good fortune, and doubtless
one reason why this nation has had such a marvelously rapid and healthy growth
is because the head and heart has always been vigorous and full of health.
How deeply significant are the words of Plato:
“Not until kings are philosophers and philosophers are kings will cities cease
from ill; no, nor the human race.” (The Republic).
And because the innumerable cells of a healthy
physical body work together in common helpfulness and harmony, we know that
they are interdependent of their very nature. If certain cells refuse to perform
their functions, or perform them badly, or try to perform functions that belong
to other cells, which sometimes happens, disease and ill health results. If
the unbrotherly cells cannot be brought into line, there is but one alternative,
they must be cast out of the body. If, perchance, the body is not strong enough
to do this, certainly then, sooner or later, it perishes.
And as with the body, so with humanity. Each unit
soul is a part of the great whole, interdependent, with a certain place to fill,
certain work to do. Not one of us can do his own work, can even exist independent
of the others. It is utterly impossible. Not one, if he do his work poorly or
unwillingly, but can so interfere with the health of the whole, that more or
less disturbance, or social disease is the result. We see all about us evidence
of such a condition. Yet we dream of better days, when all shall work together
and social health will result. And those who can “discern the signs of the times”
know that such an era, a Golden Age, is even now coming to be. For beneath all
the surface differences that appear to separate men, runs the golden cable-tow
of brotherhood, linking all men together. It is the thread of soul, for soul
is one, and it is because of this that all souls are verily children of God.
No man liveth unto himself and no man dieth unto
himself. We are our brother’s keeper in a deeper sense than we realize. Our
acts, our words, our very unspoken thoughts influence others more than they
do ourselves, though we may not realize it, may not even believe it. It is useless
for those who have been preaching a counterfeit philosophy, called anarchy,
to repudiate this abject fellow who has tried to practically apply their theories.
They are more guilty than he, for their insight into life is greater, their
opportunities have been more abundant. And not these, alone, are guilty. All
about us is the mental atmosphere. Into it we pour our thoughts, good or vile,
pure or [426][427] selfish. It is the air that
the mental self breathes. The pure and wise and strong choose from it as they
will, strong enough to refuse all that is selfish or sensual, and aware that
the pure elements within it will gravitate toward themselves, inevitably. For
the laws of magnetic attraction operate in the metaphysical as well as in the
physical world.
But few are strong enough so to choose. The weaker
majority are constantly fed and vampirized by the evil in this mental atmosphere
about them. How often do we hear of a criminal saying, “I am sorry. What made
me do it?” And today the half responsible fellow who took the life of our President
is less guilty than those who have made our thought atmosphere filthy with thoughts
of revenge, of jealousy, of discontent, of atheism. Though our statutes do not
recognize this, and inflict no penalty, yet there is a Higher Law which will
exact its due even to the uttermost farthing.
Yet does this relieve the assassin of the responsibility
for his act? Not at all. Life after life he has had the chance to choose between
good and evil, life after life has he chosen to drive out and crucify the warrior
and to strengthen the demon within him. He has opened the gateway of the fortress
of his soul to enemies, jealously, deceit, unbrotherliness. And these traitors,
once within the Sacred City, have held open the gate until the evil of the race
has entered in and the man was lost. Once he might have driven out these traitors
and barred the door. At last it became too late. How true it is that “we do
not possess our ideas; we are possessed by them.” The assassin has been his
own victim. He might have been his own creator. Instead of choosing the true
philosophy as his guide, he has chosen the false.
But how are we to discriminate between the true
and the false? Is there no criterion? There is an infallible criterion—the
Soul. And the philosophy which alone can lead the restless mind into soul-knowledge,
is and must be the eternal Doctrine of the Soul, as ancient as time itself,
as necessary to the budding soul as is sunlight to the flower. And if today
we are groping blindly, it is our own fault. The world has never been without
the Great Teacher. The Cycles fail not of their due. The Higher Law forsakes
not those who trust in it. And today, at their own Cyclic time, the Great Souls
have come to teach their own, Helena P. Blavatsky, William Q. Judge and Katherine
Tingley.
Theosophy alone contains the solution of this
problem of anarchy. And it does not counsel force. “Hatred ceaseth not by hatred,”
said a great teacher of the Heart Doctrine centuries ago, “hatred ceaseth by
love.” For Theosophy is the Heart Doctrine and never until it reaches the heart
of humanity can we hope to solve the problems of human life. Once let the anarchist
realize that all men are his brothers, King, President, statesman, that all
have common interest, common sorrows, common temptations, and this problem will
be very near solution.
Yet we have a great responsibility here. Do we
really feel as if the anarchist were our brother, or do were carefully keep
him at arm’s length while we [427][428] talk law,
and police, and deportation, and electrocution? It is plain enough that not
until we have conquered ourselves, our own vanity, our self-righteousness and
sense of separateness, can we hope to conquer him.
On the other hand, as long as the anarchist denies
God, denies the soul, so long as he refuses to recognize the soul thread that
binds all men into one vast brotherhood on the soul plane, the gulf between
the anarchist and humanity can never be bridged.
Yet the matter is not hopeless, for these are
the children. They belong to the nation to educate. And the nation is already
beginning to realize that mere intellectual learning is not enough, that the
heart has been neglected far too long. President McKinley was intellectually
a great man. Yet his greatness is never associated with that, but always with
the heart qualities that he possessed, his gentleness, purity, courage and brotherliness.
It is the straw which shows the direction of the wind. It is plain that the
world needs but the example of education on right lines, to follow and copy.
And such an example is already before it in the Raja Yoga School for Children
at Point Loma. There the children realize that they are Souls, they live in
the sunshine and the joy of soul life, and the methods used are not experimental
but are founded on principles that the ages have sifted and proven. When we
can find men of good education in every penitentiary, every insane asylum, every
disreputable line of business, it is evident that modern education does not
educate. But these conditions will pass, for the education of the future will
build upon that eternal foundation called the Soul.
The test of greatness in a nation, as in an individual,
is this; the ability to turn all circumstances, however unfavorable, to good.
During the recent crisis this nation has stood the test. Above all petty political
differences is a strong feeling of unity, of brotherhood. Above the snarl of
those who say “I don’t believe in God,” there rises, like a song, from the heart
of the nation a deep conviction that God is, a deep, abiding faith in the Higher
Law. The whole nation uttered its faith in the last words of the President “It
is God’s way. His will, not ours, be done.”
As a shock clarifies the mind of an individual,
so does a great calamity act to clarify the public mind. And it is plain at
last that this nation has taken refuge in the Soul. On that basis is our future
to be builded. Much that was dawn before to our statesmen will now become daylight,
for the Sun is rising.