Publication information |
Source: Atlanta Constitution Source type: newspaper Document type: letter to the editor Document title: “One Lesson from the Assassination of President McKinley” Author(s): Hunnicutt, W. L. C. City of publication: Atlanta, Georgia Date of publication: 16 September 1901 Volume number: 34 Issue number: none Pagination: 6 |
Citation |
Hunnicutt, W. L. C. “One Lesson from the Assassination of President McKinley.” Atlanta Constitution 16 Sept. 1901 v34: p. 6. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (personal response); crime (dealing with); gun control. |
Named persons |
W. L. C. Hunnicutt. |
Document |
One Lesson from the Assassination of President McKinley
Editor Constitution: The firing
of the pistol which took the life of the president of the United States has
shocked the civilized world, and brings prominently to notice a dastardly weapon
which has for more than half a century been the disgrace of the civil life and
jurisprudence of the American people.
In the days when the American Indians had no firearms
and when bears roved in numbers through the land, a man might have defended
himself with a pistol, which could be much more conveniently carried than a
longer gun. But those days have passed, never to return. No man can now defend
himself with a pistol. It is almost solely the instrument of the murderer and
assassin. When it kills, it kills the wrong man. The having a pistol on one’s
self is so far from being a defense that it constitutes a strong presumptive
justification of one’s slayer. He who conceals an engine of death to others
on his person thereby makes himself virtually an outlaw. When the man accused
of murder can prove that his victim was carrying or was accustomed to carry
a pistol, he is never convicted.
The laws against carrying concealed weapons are
almost wholly futile, since there is no adequate provision for their enforcement.
They practically work great injustice by putting those who obey the law at the
mercy of those who disobey it.
If pistols were abolished so that no man could
have one, then no honorable man would want one. At least seven-tenths of all
murders in this country would be avoided if pistols were abolished. The right
to bear arms does not imply the right to carry a pistol. The law may prohibit
shortness as well as concealment, and can be enforced only by making the shortest
lawful gun too long to be concealed on one’s person—say, 3 feet long.
Every American citizen is interested in this question
and owes it to himself and to his country to use his influence to have this
enemy of peace and life driven out of existence. Surely there is power enough
in the states of the union to abolish utterly and forever a thing which is not
needed, which does so much harm and so little good as the pistol. Even the evils
arising from the accidental discharge of pistols far overbalance any good they
may be supposed to do.
W. L. C. HUNNICUTT.