Publication information |
Source: Faribault Journal Source type: newspaper Document type: article Document title: “Acted in Good Faith” Author(s): anonymous City of publication: Faribault, Minnesota Date of publication: 2 October 1901 Volume number: 4 Issue number: 48 Pagination: [7] |
Citation |
“Acted in Good Faith.” Faribault Journal 2 Oct. 1901 v4n48: p. [7]. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley burial vault (attack upon); Chambers J. Deprend; William S. Biddle, Jr.; William S. Biddle, Jr. (public statements); Elwell S. Otis. |
Named persons |
William S. Biddle, Jr.; Chambers J. Deprend [misspelled once below]; William McKinley; Elwell S. Otis. |
Document |
Acted in Good Faith
PRIVATE DEPREND’S STORY GENERALLY ACCEPTED
BY THE SOLDIERS AT CANTON.
HIS CAPTAIN IS SKEPTICAL
Thinks the Sentinel Deceived Himself on the Occurrence—Another Officer
Says It Was the Real Thing and Damage Was Intended to the Dead
President’s Resting Place—Matter Reported in Full to General Otis.
Canton, O., Oct. 1.—The officers and men of Company
C of the Fourteenth United States infantry [sic], on duty at West Lawn cemetery
guarding the resting place of President McKinley, have worked diligently investigating
the strange story in which Private Deprened, who was on duty at the top of the
vault, figured so prominently. The same reticence imposed by military regulations
which prevented the officers and men from making detailed statements concerning
the incidents of the night was operative during the day. The representative
of the Associated Press saw all of the commissioned officers and a number of
privates and gleaned the following:
All of the commissioned officers and the members
of the company in general accepted fully the story related by Private Deprend
and really believe that the prowlers were about the vault with no good purpose.
Only one of the commissioned officers adhered to the belief that an attempt
had been made upon the sentinel for ghoulish purposes. He said:
“It was the real thing. It was prompted by the pure
cussedness of some people who thought to bring reproach upon the nation by doing
damage to the resting place of the dead president.”
All the men who were seen expressed the belief
that Private Deprend acted in good faith and that he related only what he believed
to be the real circumstances. With the captain and others he
Went Over the Details
of the whole affair at least a dozen times and it is said never varied in
a matter of importance. Particular inquiry was made as to his sobriety at the
time and it is said that it is established beyond all reasonable doubt that
he had not been drinking and that he was in his normal condition. The most common
belief is that the sentinel was overwrought by the loneliness of his position,
that his nerves were overtaxed and that imagination contributed some of the
details related in good faith. The post was regarded by all as particularly
isolated and depressing to the man guarding it at night and it is understood
that more sentinel[s] will be stationed at the point in the future.
Captain Biddle was at first fully convinced of
the truth of the story as related, but after investigation entertained doubts,
not as to the sincerity of the soldier, but as to the correctness of the conclusions.
He authorized this statement:
“I think the sentinel deceived himself on the
occurrence. I do not think an actual attack as related by him occurred. When
daylight came there was no evidence found of a struggle.”
The matter has been reported in full to General
Otis at Chicago, commanding the department to which the guard is attached. Whether
there will be a formal inquiry into the matter remains for General Otis to determine.