Publication information |
Source: Friend Source type: newspaper Document type: editorial Document title: “Precautions Against Anarchists” Author(s): T., W. P. City of publication: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Date of publication: 12 October 1901 Volume number: 75 Issue number: 13 Pagination: 101 |
Citation |
T., W. P. “Precautions Against Anarchists.” Friend 12 Oct. 1901 v75n13: p. 101. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
anarchism (personal response); anarchism (dealing with); anarchism (government response). |
Named persons |
William Butler; James A. Garfield; Abraham Lincoln; William McKinley. |
Document |
Precautions Against Anarchists
An Anarchist is defined by Webster to be one
“who promotes disorder.”
In view of the sudden, distressing and unfeeling
attack upon President McKinley and its sad, sad results, for which the whole
nation deeply mourns, the public mind naturally turns to the most feasible and
legal means of preventing the recurrence of such distressing events. This one
differs in some respects from the two preceding ones on Presidents Lincoln and
Garfield, in that the poor, misguided man, without hesitation, avows himself
to be an Anarchist, virtually a foreigner, whose object is to destroy governments;
what they would do without one, does not appear. It may be that more stringent
naturalization laws are needed. There is no doubt however, that a very close
scrutiny on the part of the Judges of our Courts before admitting immigrants
to the right of citizenship should be exercised.
If all Judges were to exercise the same close
scrutiny practised by Judge William Butler, Senior, whilst presiding over the
United States District Court in Philadelphia, there would probably be less danger
to be apprehended from this class of misguided men. During his judicial career
in that Court a man presented himself asking to be made a citizen of the United
States. Judge Butler being a man of very close observation had his suspicions
aroused that this applicant belonged to a society whose avowed object is to
overthrow all governments.
He usually, or frequently permitted the clerk
of the Court to propound the proper questions to be asked applicants, but in
this instance he appears to have made the inquiries himself.
Something like the following in substance took
place: “Are you a member of any secret society? Yes, I belong to a benevolent
(or some such organization). Have you a copy of the Constitution of that society?
No, he had not, but his friend who had come to vouch for his good character
had. The Judge asked for it, and at his leisure carefully examined it, and found
that this applicant, on becoming a member of that society, had taken an oath
to use all his efforts to overthrow and destroy the government of the United
States.
On his appearance in Court the next morning to
learn the Judge’s decision he was addressed by the Judge in language something
like the following:
“I have examined the Constitution of the society
of which you admit yourself to be a member and I find by that, you have bound
yourself by oath to use all your efforts to overthrow and destroy this government.
Now you come here and propose to take an oath to support the government of the
United States. I cannot permit you to perjure yourself—you may go.” There were
other instances of the same close scrutiny on the part of Judge Butler and to
such extent as to bring upon him the censure of that class of men.