Publication information |
Source: Hanford Daily Journal Source type: newspaper Document type: editorial Document title: “A Disgraceful Exhibition” Author(s): anonymous City of publication: Hanford, California Date of publication: 7 September 1901 Volume number: 7 Issue number: 99 Pagination: [2] |
Citation |
“A Disgraceful Exhibition.” Hanford Daily Journal 7 Sept. 1901 v7n99: p. [2]. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (public response: criticism); McKinley assassination (public response: Hanford, CA); Hearst newspapers (role in the assassination); Hearst newspapers; William Randolph Hearst; anarchism (dealing with). |
Named persons |
William Waldorf Astor; Elizabeth; William Randolph Hearst; William McKinley. |
Document |
A Disgraceful Exhibition
Last evening there was a demonstration, or an
opera bouffe display, of which this city, as a whole, is not proud of—in fact,
it generally is ashamed of. We refer to the burning in effigy, at the corner
of Douty and Seventh streets, of three dummies, made of gunny sacks [s]tuffed
with straw, to represent W. R. Hearst’s three American newspapers—the New York
World [sic], Chicago American and S. F. Examiner. One of the participants in
this supposed-to-be expression of public sentiment made a speech in which he
declared that these three American newspapers have done more to encourage anarchy
in the United States than any other newspapers published.
The participants in this disgraceful exhibition
of malice should be heartily [a]shamed of themselves and we believe they will
be when they sit down coolly and think the matter over. The act is [a]lleged
to have been the result of the attempted assassination of President McKinley.
What bosh! None of Mr. Hearst’s papers ever advocated the use of [t]he pistol
or the bomb to right the wrongs of the industrial classes, but have advocated
their keeping within the law. Any one knows this who reads those papers.
The Examiner has done as much for this coast as
any newspaper, if not more. It has the largest circulation of any S. F[.] newspaper,
as is well known, and it has [b]uilt up that circulation not by pandering to
the rich, but in taking the side of the people time and again.
The Examiner is owned by W. R. Hearst, a young
man who inherited millions from his father. Unlike most of the sons of the very
rich, he has not spent his time in being a snob and squandering his wealth,
to no good, useful purpose for himself or the world. His time and his energies
have been put into building up great newspapers—not newspapers which pander
to the snobs, as did Astor—but newspapers which give the news and which advocate
the right[s] of the plain American people[.] Mr. Hearst has made mistakes—many
of them—who has not? He is at outs with his own party in San Francisco and the
State and no political party can claim him. He is a free lance. But this millionaire
is doing his best to help the laboring masses—to keep them from being crushed
by the powers of combined wealth. And for this he is to be held responsible
for the attempt on the life of President McKinley by a Polish anarchist—one
of the same s tripe [sic] of human beings, misnamed men, who assassinated the
King of Italy, the President of the French Republic, Empress Elizabeth of Austria
and other royal personages.
The cure for such sores upon the body politic
as the anarchists is not to be found within our borders. It is an imported disease
of the old world, allowed to propagate unmolested upon the soil of this republic.
Get at the seat of the disease, gentlemen, which is not allowing the scum of
the earth, in fact inviting it, to come to our shores and live and work out
their plots. The people will decide that more stringent laws against foreign
immigration and in favor of “America for Americans” is what is needed, and not
the gagging of the public press.