Publication information |
Source: Times Source type: newspaper Document type: letter to the editor Document title: “President Roosevelt” Author(s): Gladney, Frank Y. City of publication: London, England Date of publication: 19 September 1901 Volume number: none Issue number: 36564 Pagination: 6 |
Citation |
Gladney, Frank Y. “President Roosevelt.” Times [London] 19 Sept. 1901 n36564: p. 6. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
Roosevelt presidency (predictions, expectations, etc.); Theodore Roosevelt (presidential policies); the press (criticism). |
Named persons |
Frank Y. Gladney; Theodore Roosevelt. |
Document |
President Roosevelt
TO THE EDITOR OF THE TIMES.
Sir,—The refusal to prejudge the President of
the United States in his attitude towards England and Europe, as voiced in this
morning’s issue of The Times, is most gratifying to all Americans now
in this country. During the last few days a large portion of the English Press
has ventured to foreshadow a change in the foreign policy of the Republic. It
is prophesied that President Roosevelt will not strive to preserve the most
amicable relation now existing between the two Anglo-Saxon Governments.
These forebodings seem to be based on the report
of a speech made by the President only a few days before the transpiration of
the mournful tragedy that placed him at the head of the nation. I have been
unable to obtain a full report of the speech, and hence cannot judge of the
soundness of the inferences that have been made. But whatever may have been
its import, in view of the calamitous changes that have since taken place it
is greatly to be regretted that such an utterance should be the occasion of
embarrassing predictions as to the policy of the new Administration. Many of
my fellow-countrymen now in England have spoken of this in my hearing and have
deplored it. Such a view, if widely prevalent, would certainly have a reactionary
influence.
It is extremely improbable that any changes in
the policy of the late President will take place during the remainder of the
present term. Indeed, an official announcement to the contrary is before the
public. The people, as a whole, would be decidedly opposed to such a change,
and any supposition that the President favours it is wholly gratuitous. His
diversified career has been strangely distorted through the medium of the metropolitan
papers of New York. Aside from his independence of political leaders, which
the English public is wont to magnify into an unreasoning autocracy, he is a
man of sound judgment, of great learning, and of political sagacity. I do not
think it any exaggeration to say that the vast majority of voters would have
chosen, had the opportunity for it been necessary, Theodore Roosevelt as the
most fit of all men in the United States to receive the mantle of the murdered
Chief Executive. A part of that fitness is not only the ability and the determination
but the willingness to continue the kindly relations with “Our Old Home” across
the sea.
Permit me, Sir, to add one more to the thousand
of expressions of gratitude of the American citizens for the unfeigned sympathy
of the English people in this blackest hour of the apostate assassin’s rage.
Yours, with great respects,
FRANK Y. GLADNEY.
Leamington Spa, Sept. 17.