Publication information |
Source: The Seven Cardinal Virtues Source type: book Document type: book chapter Document title: “Courage” [chapter 2] Author(s): Stalker, James Publisher: American Tract Society Place of publication: New York, New York Year of publication: 1902 Pagination: 24-40 (excerpt below includes only pages 26-27) |
Citation |
Stalker, James. “Courage” [chapter 2]. The Seven Cardinal Virtues. New York: American Tract Society, 1902: pp. 24-40. |
Transcription |
excerpt of chapter |
Keywords |
Leon Czolgosz. |
Named persons |
Hercules; William McKinley; Thor. |
Notes |
From title page: By Rev. James Stalker, D.D. |
Document |
Courage [excerpt]
What, then, is the connection between
wisdom and courage? Wisdom, as we saw in last chapter, is chiefly concerned
with the object of existence; it fixes on the supreme good which we decide to
pursue. And courage is the force by which the obstacles which impede this pursuit
are overcome. It is a kind of indignation, which blazes out against everything
which would prevent it from going where duty calls. It is the club of Hercules,
or the hammer of Thor, with which we clear the path to the goal.
It is highly important to keep this connection
between wisdom and courage in view, because it enables us to distinguish between
true courage and its counterfeits, of which there are many. No sailor is more
resolute in facing the stormy seas than is the pirate in tracking the booty
on which he has fixed his cupidity; but we do not honour the resolution of such
a human shark with the name of bravery; we call it ferocity. No confessor, championing
the truth in [26][27] the face of principalities
and powers, is more sure of his own opinions than is many an ignoramus, who,
gifted with nothing but self-conceit and a loud voice, shouts down the argument
of all opponents; but we do not call such noisy stubbornness by the name of
courage; we call it pig-headedness. The assassin of President McKinley took
his life in his hand and must have been more certain of having to die for what
he was about to do than is the leader of the most desperate forlorn hope on
the field of battle; but, whatever his master motive may have been—whether it
was an overweening vanity and craving for notoriety, or a maglignant [sic]
hatred of capitalism and a morbid compassion for the poor—we do not count his
act a brave one. It sends to the heart no thrill such as a brave act excites,
but quite the reverse.