| Publication information |
|
Source: Law Times Source type: journal Document type: letter Document title: “Our American Letter” Author(s): Davenport, James Pierpont Date of publication: 12 October 1901 Volume number: 111 Issue number: 3054 Pagination: 515-17 (excerpt below includes only pages 515-16) |
| Citation |
| Davenport, James Pierpont. “Our American Letter.” Law Times 12 Oct. 1901 v111n3054: pp. 515-17. |
| Transcription |
| excerpt |
| Keywords |
| McKinley assassination (government response); William McKinley (death: government response); Leon Czolgosz (trial: compared with Guiteau trial); Theodore Roosevelt. |
| Named persons |
| Leon Czolgosz; James A. Garfield; Charles J. Guiteau; William McKinley; Theodore Roosevelt. |
| Document |
Our American Letter [excerpt]
New York, Sept. 24.
T universal grief and horror at the assassination
of President McKinley were manifested in the courts by a general suspension
of business on the day when the news became generally known. Without any concerted
action by the judges, the whole calendar of causes was in some cases adjourned,
and few trials were had in the days succeeding the assault upon the President.
On the day of his funeral none of the courts were open. The busiest season of
the lawyer’s year had not yet begun, and the suspension of occupation was almost
unprecedented. One of the most impressive acts of respect was the adjournment
of the Ohio courts for several days, and the attendance of the Circuit Court
judges from all parts of the State at the funeral services at Canton. The annual
convention of the Ohio judges was in session a few days before the funeral,
and resolutions were passed that the whole body of judges assemble at Canton
and show their respect to their fellow member of the Ohio Bar, who had become
the beloved President of the United States.
The trial of the President’s murderer was in striking
contrast with that of the murderer of President Garfield twenty years ago. Czolgosz
refused to select counsel, and the lawyers assigned to him were among the most
eminent members of the Buffalo Bar. The murderer acknowledged his guilt, but
under the laws of the State of New York conviction cannot be had upon the plea
of guilty when the punishment is capital. The counsel simply took pains to see
that all the forms of law were complied with, and that no improper evidence
was admitted. A few short sessions of the court, in which everything was carried
on with the greatest dignity, sufficed to convict the assassin. The trial of
Guiteau, the assassin of President Garfield, on the other hand, was marked by
a lack of dignity on the part of the defendant’s counsel at some stages of the
proceedings, and the appearance and conduct of the defendant were such as to
render the proceedings even more painful than was essential from the character
of the case. The result of the trial in either case was [515][516]
inevitable, and the quick and orderly manner in which the later trial was conducted
showed a marked advance in judicial procedure.
President McKinley was the last of a long line
of lawyer-Presidents. President Roosevelt is the first President in over twenty
years who has not been an active member of the Bar. Mr. Roosevelt was a student
of law, but never practised that profession.