| The Physical Stigmata of the Criminal       Dr. W. Norwood East, 
              the deputy medical officer in the Convict Prison, at Portland, England, 
              believes, evidently, that the criminal carries with him some physical 
              signs of his degeneracy. In the Journal of Mental Science, 
              for October, he contributes a carefully written paper on “Physical 
              and Moral Insensibility in the Criminal.” Dr. East, like every sensible 
              man, knows that there are criminals and criminals. In other words, 
              the various criminal classes must be distinguished and differentiated. 
              The accidental criminal is one kind; the occasional criminal is 
              another; and the professional criminal is still another. These facts 
              are, of course, patent to scientists, but the average declaimer 
              against “sin” and “materialism” fails to distinguish them. A case 
              in point is that of the assassin, Czolgosz, who was an “occasional” 
              criminal and in no sense a “professional” one. He offended on one 
              particular occasion only and then in obedience to a vicious dogma 
              which had been preached into him. He was in every sense sane and 
              responsible, and has been pronounced so by every alienist who has 
              studied him or his history. In such a criminal the stigmata of degeneracy 
              would not necessarily be found, and, even if they were found, would 
              not necessarily indicate his irresponsibility.Dr. East found in 100 convicts at 
              Portland Prison that the three classes, (1) accidental, (2) occasional, 
              and (3) professional criminals, represent three degrees of moral 
              and physical sensibility, and that the difference in these respects 
              is on the whole greater between the first and second than between 
              the second and third for moral sensibility, and the reverse for 
              physical sensibility. Dr. East’s general conclusion is that sensibility 
              is impaired in the criminal, and most so in the professional criminal; 
              and this is quite in accord with the inexpert observation of most 
              persons. In the brain of the professional criminal the number of 
              conscious sensory elements is reduced, and hence the range of ideation 
              is less. The paper has value as a contribution to both the physiology 
              and psychology of crime.
 |