|  
             Industrial Socialism or the Problem of Getting 
              a Living [excerpt] 
                 Socialists draw a beautiful 
              picture of future industrial conditions where peace and plenty everywhere 
              abound. In [282][283] examining the 
              background of the picture, the scenery and the figures, I can see 
              that most of the color spread upon the canvas is drawn from the 
              imagination. Looking again I see another picture where the background, 
              the scenery and the figures are all real, they have been spread 
              on the canvas with the color of actual experience in human life. 
              This picture represents the evolution of mankind in solving the 
              problem of getting a living. It shows improvement upon improvement, 
              progress following progress. It also shows that the spirit of justice, 
              never sleeping, constantly operating upon men, actively and steadfastly 
              asserting its claims to the conscience and judgment of the world, 
              forces its decrees in proportion as wealth increases and that wealth 
              increases and finds more equitable distribution in proportion as 
              it is respected and protected. 
                   Still another picture appears before 
              me in which the figures, the scenery and the background are all 
              real. I saw in a neighboring city two years ago a great exposition, 
              to which were brought the best products of all America. These products 
              were summoned as witnesses of man’s skill and invention. Rewards 
              were offered and the measure of reward was determined by benefits 
              to humanity. Man asserting his individuality and operating through 
              private agencies was there contesting for these rewards. 
                   The President was there also to join 
              with the people in honor of their industrial triumph. Of the eighty 
              million inhabitants of this country there was one man present, a 
              [283][284] young man, who hated the 
              present economic system, who believed that capital robs labor, that 
              the rich are the rulers and that it was his duty to kill the President 
              because he was a slave of capital. 
                   This man said: “I was born in Detroit 
              nearly twenty-nine years ago. I got my education in the public schools 
              in Detroit and then went to Cleveland. In Cleveland I read books 
              on socialism and met a great many socialists. I was pretty well 
              known as a socialist in the west. During the last five years I have 
              had as friends, anarchists in Chicago, Cleveland and Detroit, and 
              suppose I have become more or less bitter. I never had much luck 
              and this preyed upon me. What started the craze to kill was a lecture 
              I heard some time ago by Emma Goldman. Miss Goldman’s words went 
              right through me and when I heard the lecture I made up my mind 
              that I would do something heroic for the cause I love.” 
             . 
                  Can we fail to see 
              and shudder at the fatal similarity between the ideas expressed 
              by Cholgosz and the ideas now taught by leading socialists, labor 
              unionists and anarchists? “The slave of capital,” said Cholgosz. 
              “Capital enslaves the wage workers,” say these teachers. Perhaps 
              they did not intentionally encourage that tragedy. Maybe they did 
              not know their extravagant and virulent utterances were loaded with 
              assassination. At that time did they believe what they preached? 
              Do they believe it now? If they do believe it [284][285] 
              ought not that pistol shot to be taken as a signal by them and all 
              others to pause and carefully re-examine and thoroughly review and 
              candidly reconsider the facts surrounding the now burning issue 
              which involves such terrible consequences to mankind? 
                   That poor young man, who was educated 
              in the public schools, who read books on socialism, whose life was 
              made bitter, who never had any luck at anything, was tried and convicted 
              alone and put to death in less than a month. Vengeance was swift. 
              In youth and alone. Think of it! Young and alone in that dark hour 
              in the morning of his life! McKinley was buried with universal tears 
              and covered with flowers. Cholgosz was buried with universal curses 
              and covered with quick lime. 
                   Is it not strange, more than that, 
              is it not pitiful that not one of the many who taught the economic 
              philosophy which he believed and which, however misguided, he gave 
              his life to advance, came out into the open then, and offered a 
              word or look or sign of sympathy in that mortal crisis of his young 
              life? What a cowardly confession of doubt in the truth of their 
              doctrines is concealed in the universal desertion of Cholgosz and 
              in the shameless silence which prevailed among those who incited 
              and encouraged hatred of capitalists in teaching socialism to the 
              American people. 
             |