Publication information |
Source: Congregationalist and Christian World Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “McKinley Memorial Sunday” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: 20 September 1902 Volume number: 87 Issue number: 38 Pagination: 395 |
Citation |
“McKinley Memorial Sunday.” Congregationalist and Christian World 20 Sept. 1902 v87n38: p. 395. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley memorial services, first anniversary. |
Named persons |
William R. Day; James Gibbons; William McKinley; Philip S. Moxom; Theodore Roosevelt; Charles Emory Smith; William A. Stone. |
Document |
McKinley Memorial Sunday
Spontaneously in most cases, but at the suggestion
of prelates like Cardinal Gibbons in some instances and of public officials
like Governor Stone of Pennsylvania in others, churches of all faiths set apart
one service last Sunday as a memorial service for the beloved President of the
nation who was killed by an assassin one year ago. Everywhere clergy and people
responded naturally and honestly to the call. Nowhere so far as we have seen
was there anything but admiration expressed for his life and character. At Canton,
O., his home, his long-time friend, Judge Day, whom he selected to be Secretary
of State, paid his tribute, and emphasized, as all must who study the character
of the dead leader, his gentleness of spirit, his forgiving temper, his disinclination
to harm the feelings of any man. This point is admirably developed by another
of President McKinley’s Cabinet advisers, Charles Emory Smith, in his recent
article in the Saturday Evening Post. Rev. Dr. P. S. Moxom, preaching
in the South Church, Springfield, last Sunday, expressed the judgment of thoughtful
men when he said that Mr. McKinley “did his work in a difficult time, when new
problems were emerging, with a fidelity and skill which are appreciated more
and more highly as the man and his work recede into historical perspective.
One thing grows clear, he was always somewhat greater than we knew. . . . It
was its moral quality which gave to his life its supreme distinction.”
Temperamentally Mr. McKinley was quite different
from his successor. Each was fitted for the task to be done, and journals which,
like the New York Sun, are now covertly trying to undermine the influence
of President Roosevelt by comparing him with President McKinley, to the disparagement
of the former, are not doing that which the dead statesman would indorse [sic].