Highways and Byways [excerpt]
WHEN the national bereavement caused Theodore Roosevelt, the vice-president,
to become president of the United States, a profound sense of responsibility,
and of the possible effect of apprehension on the prosperity of
the country, prompted him to add to the constitutionally prescribed
pledge one of a voluntary and highly significant character. He solemnly
declared to the members of the cabinet who were present that he
would continue “absolutely unbroken” the policy of McKinley. This
announcement had a reassuring effect on the business situation,
which had received a severe shock and seemed actually threatened
with serious depression. A day or two later came the further announcement
that the members of the cabinet would all be retained, or urged
to remain at their respective posts till the end of the term. At
the same time an official statement was given to the press embodying
the policy of the new president—or rather, his conception and understanding
of the policy of his predecessor, which he had pledged himself to
carry out in spirit, if not the letter.
That important statement contained a number
of definite propositions, the most noteworthy being: The arbitration
of international disputes; commercial peace, reciprocity and the
avoidance of tariff wars through reasonable concessions to our European
customers; the construction of the isthmian canal and the Pacific
cable; the protection of the savings of the people by means of sound
laws and fit appointments; and the encouragement of the merchant
marine.
These will easily be recognized as the
principles and measures for which the lamented president stood.
Mr. Roosevelt has added nothing of his own, and the people of the
United States are now satisfied that the man whose vigor, independence,
courage, and honesty they had so warmly admired will make a conservative,
careful and judicious chief executive. The change in the personal
aspect of the executive branch of the government will not produce
any departure from the program for which the majority of the voters
declared in the fall of 1900, when they reëlected Mr. McKinley.
While duly honoring Mr. Roosevelt for his
wise and modest course, one may recall the fact that the vice-presidents
who have in the past succeeded to the presidency by virtue of the
constitutional devolution of power have come to grief politically
through attempting changes of policy. Not one of them received a
nomination for the presidency at the expiration of the accidental
term of that office. General Arthur was so dignified and discreet
a president that he was widely believed to deserve a nomination,
but the convention of 1884 set him aside in favor of the brilliant
Mr. Blaine, who was defeated. Mr. Roosevelt was regarded as a presidential
candidate, and just before the Buffalo tragedy a movement in his
favor was set on foot in the middle west. There is little doubt
that he will be a prominent candidate in 1904, and to many shrewd
politicians his nomination is a practical certainty.
Meantime he is expected to put aside all
ambition and all political designs and devote himself to the faithful
and energetic performance of his duties. Mr. Roosevelt, though the
youngest of our presidents, has had exceptionally varied experience
in public life—as civil service commissioner, New York police commissioner,
and governor of the state of New York. In the last named office
he exhibited remarkable qualities, and his administration was an
eminently successful one. The act for the taxation of franchises
as real estate, and the tenement-house reform law, were passed at
his earnest solicitation. He proved himself as practical as he was
straightforward and high-minded.
It must be admitted that in Europe, [117][118]
especially in Germany, Mr. Roosevelt’s accession to the presidency
created some alarm. The more “imperialist” press described him as
a “chauvinist” and aggressive advocate of the Monroe doctrine in
its extreme signification of “marching Europe out of America.” But
there is no warrant for this assumption. President Roosevelt will
not go beyond President Cleveland and Mr. Olney in his construction
of the Monroe policy, and he has expressed his disapproval of “bluster”
and threats and aggression. The old-world powers have nothing to
fear from the present administration if they intend to respect American
traditions and principles in the western hemisphere. And there is
no reason for supposing that they entertain any ambitions incompatible
with known traditional views of American statesmanship.
|