Our Late President
The untimely and ignominious death
of President William McKinley cast a deep gloom over the entire
country and brought grief and sorrow to a charitable, a powerful,
and a prosperous Nation.
No one but the anarchist or one of
their family ever dreamed that the Nation’s Chief Magistrate would
be carried back to our national Capital in a lifeless state. Cut
off in the blossom of mature manhood, in the prime of his statesmanship,
in a life of usefulness, and in a day of much concern to the American
people. Cut off at a time when the great empire state was demonstrating
to the world the progress of the American nation; at a time when
his policy, together with a majority opinion of the American people,
were sharing prosperity and carrying Christianity, light and knowledge
to the ignorant and benighted in the distant seas.
But withal he now sleeps the sleep
of death, with Lincoln and Garfield, who, too, met their untimely
end by the hand of treachery and violence. President McKinley had
a right to live, and a right to expect to live, just as much as
the anarchist, Leon Czolgosz, who treacherously took his life.
President McKinley faithfully served
his country at every calling. When the country wanted men to defend
its flag, he bravely and willingly answered the call. In the Congress
of the Nation he was steadfast and resolute in advocating the opinion
which brought prosperity to the country he so much loved. Thus life
was sweet to him and valuable to his fellow-countrymen, whose honor
and respect as their chief ruler and representative he enjoyed;
unlike the anarchist who took his life—for his was a life of care,
of duty and of great responsibilities. It never was his effort to
assassinate, but to promote life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness
which is the true spirit and the leading principle of the country,
and therefore his opinions of civil government will live, associating
themselves with peace, harmony and prosperity for all time. Anarchism
in parts of the country is a twin spirit to the mob violence prevailing
in the South. Both are opposed to civil law and orderly government;
opposed to Christianity and civilization; opposed to any rule which
leads to justice for crimes committed, or any mandate that guides
a nation or a community in the path of rectitude.
And if this anarchism which is making
every effort to become paramount in different parts of the country,
like the mob spirit and lynch law which seem to be supreme over
civil communities in the South, is allowed to prevail, the possession
of life and liberty will be only a dream; the light of Christianity
with the spirit of civilization will fade as the setting of the
sun behind the Western hills; the comforts of prosperity of law
and order will be anything but a reality. For it is plainly evident
that the anarchist, as well as those who adhere to the lynching
code, have no respect for law and order. The anarchist must assassinate,
must take life, because he or she is rich and prominent and a ruler
of the people, though so installed by a majority of common consent.
The lynchers must kill and destroy
life because he or she is black and is trying to achieve the highest
point in manhood and womanhood. One case in point: Frazier B. Baker
was regularly appointed and installed postmaster at Lake City, S.
C., but he was a black man and for that reason he, like President
William [446][447] McKinley, met an
untimely and ignominious death.
The anarchists say that “The Civil
Code should be abolished and every man be allowed to govern himself
or his community as he wants to,” and is therefore opposed to any
rule promoting law and order in the community wherein they reside;
is opposed to all governments and heads of governments—whether they
are presidents or czars. But supposing they did accomplish their
desire in having the civil courts abolished and have no judges to
pass upon the wrongs of the people, have no officers of the law
to arrest murderers, and there be no legal advocates to discourage
the acts of committing atrocious crimes, what would be the worth
of American freedom and civilization, of property, of life and liberty,
of happiness and prosperity? And, again, if in the presence of the
law the anarchist walks in with bold deceit and takes life, and
the atrocious deed be applauded by those of his society, what would
be done in the absence of the law? The presidents of railroads,
of banks, and of great business co-operations, leaders of political
parties, governors of states, mayors of cities and heads of mercantile
houses would not live out half their days. But the anarchist would
call this , a liberty we hope they
will never enjoy.
But they say that they are “Full of
the love of liberty and the principles that make that liberty worth
enjoying.” Which is a liberty and a principle?—to burn houses, destroy
property and take the lives of those who may personally or officially
offend and displease them; a liberty diabolical in its conception
and a principle born in atrocities which finds no place in the American
heart and should have no existence upon the American soil.
They want ,
, , for this is their open and confessed creed, which puts
them against God and establishes them an enemy of man, against humanity,
and no friend to civilization, Christianity, law and order. But
withal the unjust disfranchisement, lynching and burning at stake
colored Americans, withal the “Jim Crow Car” laws, and other unjust
statutes enacted by the different Legislatures in the South against
colored citizens, none have been so unkind or so unpatriotic as
to breathe of vengeance against the state or church, but have been
patient and long suffering—philosophical and kind. And let us hope
that good heaven will forbid that any citizen of color will ever
prove anything but a loyal supporter of his country’s flag and all
it represents. And that would simply be in keeping with his past
record, for whether on the field of battle or as a civilian the
Negro has proved himself a worthy citizen; and in that, he holds
in greater respect and is more obedient to the laws, which the anarchists
seek with every effort to put under their feet, ignoring the peace
and harmony of the glorious country in which they live, holding
in contempt the honored flag that gave them a home upon the free
soil, and brings to their door happiness and prosperity, exceeding
that afforded by the country from which they were exiled.
And yet with this fair treatment,
it seems to be their desire to assassinate and take the life of
illustrious citizens who are the chosen heads of the government.
And after they accomplish their aim what will it profit them? They
took the life of the President of the United States—what is their
gain? Contempt, antipathy and utter dislike for them and theirs.
But it has awakened the whole world of sympathy and sorrow, of love
and respect, for the dead President, which follows him to his untimely
but honored grave, and which will in future build monuments to his
memory.
A love and a respect rightly and honorably
merited, not by favors, but by his work and worth, by his fervent
respect for the glorious flag under which he was born, by his love
and devotion to the people whom he served in every official capacity,
by his high opinions of the Amer- [447][448]
ican principles, which he unrelentedly advocated from youth to manhood
and through all the years of his public service, until he sublimely
achieved a high order of statesmanship.
And though untimely sent to his long
home, he had the honor of seeing the country he loved and faithfully
served rise among the Nations, the grandest of governments, the
richest, the most civil and law-abiding Republic in the world. This
was his delight, for in sentiment and opinion he was thoroughly
American, a firm believer in the doctrine of the forefathers—which
developed in a mighty progress and unparallel [sic] success to the
American people. His highest ambition was the prosperity of his
country—the welfare, the progress, and happiness of its people;
thus he lived and died the uncompromising exponent of those heavenly
principles that makes [sic] America the most gallant and the most
famous among the galaxy of nations.
But now the great hero of the American
principles is gone—“gone to that undiscovered country from which
no traveler returns.” The disappointment, the sadness and sorrow
of death is not his; it is the Nation’s. He is free from care, sorrow
and disappointment; he has gone where contention and the bitterness
of the world’s strife is ended. The quietude of the grave is now
his dwelling. There the song of the poet is silent; the voice of
loved ones is forever hushed; the speech of friend and relation
is heard no more—all is tranquillized in death. Yet we deeply deplore
the sad and untimely taking off, we mourn his death with profound
sympathy and sorrow. The record of a noble and well spent life is
all that now remains.
|