Publication information |
Source: Commons Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “Politics and Labor” Author(s): Robins, Raymond Date of publication: January 1902 Volume number: 6 Issue number: 66 Pagination: 10-13 (excerpt below includes only pages 10 and 11) |
Citation |
Robins, Raymond. “Politics and Labor.” Commons Jan. 1902 v6n66: pp. 10-13. |
Transcription |
excerpt |
Keywords |
Theodore Roosevelt (first annual message to Congress); Theodore Roosevelt; Theodore Roosevelt (presidential policies); anarchism (laws against); anarchism (government response: criticism); anarchism (dealing with). |
Named persons |
Ernest Howard Crosby; Leon Czolgosz; Theodore Roosevelt; Leo Tolstoy [variant spelling below]. |
Notes |
The excerpt below comprises two nonconsecutive portions of the editorial (p. 10 and p. 11). Omission of text within the excerpt is denoted with a bracketed indicator (e.g., [omit]). |
Document |
Politics and Labor [excerpt]
President Roosevelt’s first message to the congress
of the United States has aroused more general interest than any other state
paper within thirty years. The extraordinary circumstances that have resulted
in the elevation of Mr. Roosevelt to the most powerful political office of the
modern world, are largely responsible for the unusual eagerness with which the
people of the English speaking nations have followed his first steps in the
courts of the mighty. Comparatively young and inexperienced, yet chief magistrate
of the foremost industrial power in a commercial age, consigned by a designing
political boss to the national political grave-yard, yet within a year, by the
awful instrumentality of an assassin’s bullet clothed with untrammeled command
of that boss and his party machinery, a reformer with high ideals, distrusted
by predatory capital and feared by politicians, yet in an hour, ushered into
the mightiest theatre of action and called without let or hindrance to play
the title role among the rulers of the earth, he has well been deemed a sign
and a wonder by the sons of men. Nor was there lacking that intoxicating flavor
of mystery that ever envelopes the new and untried leader, suddenly emerging
from obscurity into that fierce light that beats upon the throne. By some Mr.
Roosevelt was regarded as an impractical dreamer, chasing the butterflies of
municipal and national purity about the byways of Police Commissions and Civil
Service Reform. To others he appeared the incarnation of honest, common sense
and enlightened public spirit. For these latter Roosevelt was the Moses of the
upright, strenuous life, that would lead the people into the promised land of
civic righteousness, and with his own right arm lasso our modern golden calf
and drag him bellowing down the steps of the capital.
Before us lies this first deliverance of the strenuous
life in power. It is an inspiring message and worthy of our best faith in the
main. Upon questions of labor it rings true to the nobler promise of the great
Republic.
[omit]
Upon one subject only of this generally admirable
message, are we in complete dissent. Mr. Roosevelt could not have disappointed
some of his ardent admirers more, than by giving the sanction of his name and
fame to the crassly ignorant cry for legislative persecution against philosophic
anarchy. To recommend a law that would exclude Tolstoi and deport Crosby, that
had it been in force on the 6th day of last September would have divided many
happy homes, excluded some and banished other worthy citizens, but have left
us Leon Czolgosz, the republican elector and native born citizen of Cleveand
[sic] to assassinate our beloved President, is a depth of blind resentment we
had not expected from Roosevelt the brave. The change advocated by this message
in the fundamental law of the land, involving a new special jurisdiction for
the federal courts, with its calendar of state crimes, is both revolutionary
and futile.
For Czolgosz and all murderers of any faith and
name we have the gallows and the grave. For philosophic anarchy there is just
one cure, a free government providing equity for all its citizens. So long as
our government presents the spectacle in many places, of corruption at the bottom
and incompetence at the top, for just so long will ill-balanced persons, dwelling
alone upon its crying evils and forgetful of its many great though silent blessings,
revolt against government in any form. A purer administration and more equitable
legislation in city, state and nation, is the only possible answer to philosophic
anarchy. Legislative persecution to combat ideas is the bastard offspring of
ignorance and fear. The stamping out process is an old failure. The Spanish
Inquisition played out that hand three hundred years ago—and lost.