The Chicago Martyrs—and After [excerpt]
It is with surprise and shame that
I see this year’s commemoration of their death inaugurated in F
S with eulogies on the act of of
[sic] a lunatic, Leon Czolgosz. (4)
Whatever force the act eulogized might
acquire had it been performed by a person in full possession of
his faculties, it loses every vestige of significance before the
well-established dementia and irresponsibility of the perpetrator.
But suppose it were true that Czolgosz
was a “self-poised man.” Can the notion be for a moment entertained
by any sane mind that his act was helpful to the cause of progress!
(5) McKinley was no bloody tyrant. He was a tool. Moreover, he was
the representative of the majority in this country. It was for the
interest of capital to bamboozle that majority into accepting him
as their representative; but the fact remains that the great mass
of the people of the United States regarded McKinley as their representative
and they supported the atrocious acts of his administration.
They were perfectly agreeable
to the theft of the Philippines; they applauded the headlong
rush of this country toward financial inflation; they viewed
with pride the suicidal policy of the man they had elected. No matter
that the people of this country were the mere puppets of a ring
of capitalists, they are the ones with whom a Czolgosz must
reckon, and it is folly to imagine that they will ever see any point
in murder. As a matter of fact, McKinley has become a saint, and
in his dramatic death at the climax of his career, he exerts a more
insidious influence than if he had been allowed to live and reap
the harvest of his sowing. The forces of government have profited,
and have in every way recruited strength to oppress. I denounce
every attempt to drag the Chicago martyrs into companionship with
Czolgosz.
|