Publication information |
Source: Gunton’s Magazine Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “An Appalling Menace” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: October 1901 Volume number: 21 Issue number: 4 Pagination: 291-92 |
Citation |
“An Appalling Menace.” Gunton’s Magazine Oct. 1901 v21n4: pp. 291-92. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (personal response); presidential assassinations (comparison); anarchism (personal response). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz; James A. Garfield; Abraham Lincoln; William McKinley. |
Document |
An Appalling Menace
For the third time in our history a president has been murdered
during his term of office. Apart from the elements of tragic horror, which at
such a time permit little sense of degree or idea of comparison, it is certain
that the assassination of neither Lincoln nor Garfield was so charged with profound
menace as this deliberate and dastardly blow struck by the hand of anarchy.
Lincoln fell a victim to the spirit of revenge. At most, his martyrdom had nothing
of more dangerous significance in it than the echoes of a conflict permanently
closed. It did not spring from any movement that was threatening the future
of the country; indeed, it did not even represent a unanimous southern sentiment.
As for the shooting of Garfield, it represented nothing more serious than local
political disappointment.
But the murder of President McKinley is altogether
a different matter. It was the carefully planned act of a determined and thoroughly
organized body of professed enemies of society. The crime was committed in cold
blood, with deliberate malice aforethought, by men who rejoice in the act and
regard it as only one blow in a far-reaching scheme of murderous assault on
the instruments and agents of government, and through them upon government itself,
wherever it exists. The people have realized this, and with a deepening sense
of its direful meaning, from the moment when it was [291][292]
known that the president’s assailant was an agent of the anarchist propaganda.
The consciousness of it has intensified popular indignation and profound concern
throughout the nation, and it is well that this is the case. The deed done at
Buffalo calls for altogether more comprehensive action than the mere trial and
execution of Czolgosz. That can neither retrieve the past nor even satisfy the
sense of justice. The murderer is the merest pawn in the game, and in destroying
his worthless life the community takes nothing of value and secures no additional
protection. The anarchists will not be in the least daunted by Czolgosz’s fate;
they will glory in it and plan fresh assaults; so that the one thing of crucial
importance now does not relate to the past, it is to safeguard the future.