Publication information |
Source: Leslie’s Weekly Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “Teach More Respect for the President” Author(s): Cobb, Albert Winslow Date of publication: 5 October 1901 Volume number: 93 Issue number: 2404 Pagination: 302 |
Citation |
Cobb, Albert Winslow. “Teach More Respect for the President.” Leslie’s Weekly 5 Oct. 1901 v93n2404: p. 302. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (personal response); society (criticism); presidential assassinations (comparison). |
Named persons |
James A. Garfield; Abraham Lincoln; William McKinley; George Washington. |
Notes |
“Special Contributed Article to Leslie’s Weekly” (p. 302). |
Document |
Teach More Respect for the President
T
This average is altogether too frightful. Such
statistics recorded for any remote past period in any nation’s history would,
viewed thus through historical perspective, give an impression of most sanguinary,
blood-thirsty order. An exceedingly pronounced streak of this sanguinary nature
has permeated our social order from its original colonial inception. Bred by
the struggle with red savagery, the Revolutionary War, and the later titanic
contests over the issue of black slavery, this sanguinary streak, re-enforced
by constant direct accessions from a gory Old World, is yet terribly manifest.
Only by determined, systematic attention and conscientious effort can it be
reduced from its menacing proportions.
Unless such reduction can be accomplished there
is danger that the very marvelous implements, equipment, and organization of
our social system may be the means of all the more appalling disaster in some
gigantic civil or international strife in which the people of the United States
may become involved. Returning to popular habit of mind and expression toward
our President, the three instances of Presidential assassination present in
each case elements of certain clearly marked, traceable factionist abuse and
virulence, not in themselves approaching any direct menace of murder, but tending
to influence more sanguinary minds to that dire result.
In Lincoln’s case the rabid utterances of copperheadism,
point[i]ng to Lincoln as the tyrant, the autocratic abuser of constitutional
power, the dictator who was the personal embodiment and source of the Unionist
assaults on the South—it was this which acted to spur on the conspirators who
believed that the murder of Lincoln and a few of his closest advisers would
upset the entire government. Instead, it revealed behind the martyred President
and his wounded comrades a vast majority of loyal, devoted, wrath-stirred, and,
at last, thoroughly determined people. But copperheadism had done its hateful
work, so far as violence to a consecrated public servant was concerned.
In the second case of assassination a pernicious
spoils system of office-seeking, against which Lincoln himself had uttered prophetic
warnings, was fathered and made a public issue by certain high leaders and factionists
in Garfield’s own party, to such an extent as to quicken the murderous instinct
of the conceited, disappointed office-hunter who shot that good President to
death. In this third instance, which so wrings the hearts of an overwhelming
majority throughout our reunited nation, it was the intemperate, unbridled utterances
of anti-imperialism and anti-administrationism in varied form and color which
threw on our eminently beloved and constitutional President, William McKinley,
a glare that attracted toward him the pervert gaze of anarchism, and made him
a target for one of its basest and most sanguinary creatures. How the recent
purveyors of anti-Presidential invective and cartoons must love themselves now!
Now, together with rigid suppression of this latest
menace, anarchy, or any like cult of whatever name, there should proceed also
a rigid self-examination and self-control by each individual citizen of his
utterances regarding that First Citizen who holds the highest office and most
tremendously responsible one in our national gift—the President of the United
States. Because to this general duty a heterogeneous faction has been lamentably
recreant it occurs that the man who marvelously promoted domestic prosperity;
who so conducted a great foreign war that no missile of the enemy nor boom of
hostile cannon disturbed even the outmost coasts of our republic; and who has
extended its vanguard, its prows of navy and of commerce, to that very Orient
where surpassing problems of human destiny are to be wrought out, and where
our institutions can exert an incalculably valuable effect upon world-wide issues—it
occurs that this great soul has received for his mortal recompense an assassin’s
bullet; and while we the people, are possessed with faith in his imperishable
renown and his high place in the life everlasting beyond death’s veil, there
is agony at our hearts for him and his, to whom after the years of battle we
could have gladly rendered all earthly comfort and honor; but cannot, because
the opportunity for that is gone by forever. May the solemn example teach us
higher wisdom and fealty. It is time!