Publication information |
Source: Lucifer, the Light-Bearer Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “Emma Goldman Denied a Hearing” Author(s): Harman, Lillian Date of publication: 12 October 1901 Volume number: 5 Issue number: 39 Series: third series Pagination: 315 |
Citation |
Harman, Lillian. “Emma Goldman Denied a Hearing.” Lucifer, the Light-Bearer 12 Oct. 1901 v5n39 (3rd series): p. 315. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
Emma Goldman (incarceration); McKinley assassination (investigation of conspiracy: Chicago, IL: criticism); Emma Goldman (public addresses). |
Named persons |
Aesop; Leon Czolgosz; Emma Goldman; Carter H. Harrison, Jr.; William McKinley. |
Notes |
The date of publication provided by the magazine is October 12, E.
M. 301.
Whole No. 886.
Alternate magazine title: Lucifer, the Lightbearer. |
Document |
Emma Goldman Denied a Hearing
It is a principle in law, as well as in justice,
that the accused shall be heard in his own defense. This principle, however,
is absolutely ignored by the Chicago city officials in dealing with Emma Goldman.
She was arrested without warrant, held a prisoner for three weeks’ [sic] and
then, no evidence being found against her, was simply discharged without trial
or a hearing. But the police and press are determined that the people shall
believe her guilty, and to that end are trying to prevent her obtaining a hearing
anywhere. A hall had been engaged for last Thursday night, and she was announced
to deliver her lecture on “Modern Phases of Anarchy.” This was the lecture which
the Buffalo Chief of Police claimed influenced Czolgosz to kill McKinley. The
absurdity of that accusation must be manifest to every one who has heard the
lecture, for it is simply a cool, calm resume of the history and tendency of
Anarchism, and so far as it deals with methods at all, deprecates the use of
violence. Miss Goldman’s strongest defense is the lecture itself. Did the police
know this? Possibly not; but if they or Mayor Harrison had been sincere in their
effort to promote justice they could doubtless have become acquainted with the
nature of the lecture before it was delivered.
After all, the futility of repressive methods
must be apparent to every one but the most prejudice-blinded. I heard Miss Goldman
deliver this lecture, last summer, before the Society of Anthropology. The small
hall was full; but the audience probably did not exceed one hundred and fifty.
She might have gone on for years delievering [sic] this lecture to small audiences;
but as a result of this persecution thousands will want to hear her where tens
would listen before. The authorities may succeed in silencing her for weeks
and months, but the law of demand and supply will work, here as elsewhere, and
“Modern Phases of Anarchy” will be read, if not heard, by thousands who, but
for her persecution, would never have heard of Emma Goldman.
The treatment which Miss Goldman and the other
Anarchists have undergone at the hands of the Chicago police brings to mind
Æsop’s fable of
.
“Once upon a time a Wolf was lapping at a spring
on a hillside, when, looking up, what should he see but a Lamb just beginning
to drink a little lower down. ‘There’s my supper,’ thought he, ‘if only I can
find some excuse to seize it.’ Then he called out to the Lamb, ‘How dare you
muddle the water from which I am drinking?’
“‘Nay, master, nay,’ said Lambkin; ‘if the water
be muddy up there, I cannot be the cause of it, for it runs down from you to
me.’
“‘Well, then,’ said the Wolf, ‘why did you call
me bad names this time last year?’
“‘That cannot be,’ said the Lamb; ‘I am only six
months old.’
“‘I don’t care,’ snarled the Wolf; ‘if it was
not you, it was your father;’ and with that he rushed upon the poor little Lamb
and—
W
—ate her all up. But before she died she gasped out—‘Any excuse will serve a tyrant.’”