Publication information |
Source: North American Review Source type: magazine Document type: article Document title: “Detective Surveillance of Anarchists” Author(s): Pinkerton, Robert A. Date of publication: November 1901 Volume number: 173 Issue number: 540 Pagination: 609-17 (excerpt below includes only pages 609-10) |
Citation |
Pinkerton, Robert A. “Detective Surveillance of Anarchists.” North American Review Nov. 1901 v173n540: pp. 609-17. |
Transcription |
excerpt |
Keywords |
presidents (protection); assassination (preventative measures); Secret Service (criticism); anarchism (dealing with). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz; William McKinley. |
Notes |
“By Robert A. Pinkerton, one of the heads of the Pinkerton National Detective Agency.” |
Document |
Detective Surveillance of Anarchists [excerpt]
T
The great trouble with our National Government
Detective Service to-day is that politics figure largely in the appointments,
and this must result in a lack of efficiency and discipline wherever they take
up investigations of plottings by anarchists.
It is perhaps too late to discuss the terrible
calamity of President McKinley’s assassination, but it points such a strong
moral that the circumstances surrounding it ought not to be lost sight of. With
a properly trained and disciplined force of protectors for the President on
that day, I believe the tragedy might have been prevented. The first principle
of Police guardianship, such as was entrusted to those guarding the President,
is to watch the hands of all comers. This is a police axiom that is supposed
to be drilled into the minds of all men who have to do this class of work. The
hand is the machine and the only machine with which damage can be inflicted.
Whether a man is to throw a bomb, or to use a knife, or to fire a pistol, whatever
the means of assault, it must be carried out with the hand. Therefore, supervise
and control the hands of people surrounding the person to be guarded, and you
take a long step toward protecting that person from harm.
Where assassination is intended, it is impossible
to guarantee absolute protection. A man may be “picked off” with a rifle at
a less or greater distance, or he may be fired on from above while [609][610]
passing through the streets, or beneath a balcony, or a mine may be exploded
under him, but against such an assault as was committed on President McKinley
by the anarchist, Czolgosz, it is, I believe, possible to guard absolutely with
careful, quick-witted men, fully instructed as to their duties, who, although
there may be no apprehension of danger in the minds of the general public, are
there at all times ever on the alert for just such an attack as that at Buffalo.
It would seem that the guards in attendance upon the President that fateful
day should have halted Czolgosz the very minute they noticed him in the line
with a covered hand, especially a covered right hand. If the hand was really
an injured one, no great commotion need have resulted from the act of halting
him, but had a concealed weapon been disclosed, as it doubtless would have been
at Buffalo, the disturbance arising from the assassin’s being discovered would
probably have saved the President’s life. One minute’s inspection would have
revealed the assassin’s intent and at least an effort would have been made to
make him harmless.
The heads of our Government Secret Service, as
a rule, have been men of standing and efficiency; their work heretofore has
mainly been the suppression of counterfeiting and frauds against the Government.
Appropriations have been too small for what was expected of them, and they have
been greatly handicapped by being obliged to appoint their subordinates on political
recommendations from men with but little or no experience to fit them for this
important service.
There is no intention of, in any way, impugning
the present Chief of the United States Secret Service, who, although not having
been previously engaged in Police or Detective Service, has proven his capability
for the position he holds, but the department of which he is the head has had
but very little to do with anarchists, and, as at present organized, I do not
believe it would be in a condition to handle this important problem. It would
require a thorough reorganization, a large increase in the present force, no
little legislation, and a large additional appropriation before much could be
done toward controlling or eradicating the dangerous anarchists we have here
now as well as those who are coming here in greater or less numbers at all times,
and who, of late years, have seemed to do most of their plotting in this country.