Publication information |
Source: National Magazine Source type: magazine Document type: article Document title: “William McKinley as I Knew Him” Author(s): Hanna, Marcus Date of publication: January 1902 Volume number: 15 Issue number: 4 Pagination: 405-10 (excerpt below includes only pages 409-10) |
Citation |
Hanna, Marcus. “William McKinley as I Knew Him.” National Magazine Jan. 1902 v15n4: pp. 405-10. |
Transcription |
excerpt |
Keywords |
William McKinley (presidential character); Marcus Hanna; William McKinley (political character); William McKinley (personal character); McKinley assassination; William McKinley (relations with Marcus Hanna). |
Named persons |
Joe Mitchell Chapple [in notes]; Marcus Hanna; William McKinley [in notes]; John G. Milburn. |
Notes |
This article (excerpted below) is the first in a three-part series.
The remaining two installments appear in the February 1902 and June 1902
issues of the magazine.
“Editor’s Note:—The foregoing is the initial article of a series in
which Senator Hanna will review the career of William McKinley. There
will be papers dealing with the personal traits of the late President;
the part he bore in the discussion of the tariff and money questions;
his preferences in literature, music and the other fine arts as these
were revealed to his friends; his personal attitude toward the great new
national problems that became of first importance during his presidency,—these
and other phases of the work and characteristics of the best beloved of
all the American presidents. Every American is glad to pay a tribute of
regard and sorrow to his name who was lately called from his earthly task
to other spheres; no one, probably, is so well equipped as Senator Hanna
to reveal in action those qualities of mind and character which made William
McKinley what he was. There has been no other such historic friendship
in American politics as that which these two great and loyal-hearted men
gave to each other and which the survivor fittingly commemorates in these
papers” (p. 410).
The following, appearing in the same magazine issue, is excerpted
from Joe Mitchell Chapple’s “Affairs at Washington” column:
“The First of a Series of Personal Reminiscences of the Late President”
(p. 405).
“By Senator Marcus A. Hanna” (p. 405). |
Document |
William McKinley as I Knew Him [excerpt]
My associations with him during the years of
executive life gave me further opportunity to appreciate as I never had before,
the great reserve force which he possessed. He seems to have met every emergency,
and the unusual problems and annoying complications of the times, in a masterful
way. These conditions furnished the opportunity for him to demonstrate his enormous
talent and ability for successfully solving every problem, rising to the full
measure of every situation, and overcoming all obstacles.
And then the summing of it all in that beautiful
death, which was so characteristic of his career, is one almost unequalled in
history. He has won the admiration, love and respect of all classes of his own
people, and of all nations.
There was one phrase used when we first opened
the campaign for him in 1895 that seemed to fit the situation, and that was
the claim that he was the “logical candidate.” In the first place, he marked
out for himself a distinctive political career. He had spent every energy and
used every effort in all his public service for the highest and best interests
of his people, inspired always by patriotic impulse, with a sincerity never
questioned. His election to an office always meant more than the mere gratification
of a selfish political ambition. He said to me once—and I cite it here to show
that his ambitions never sprang from selfish motives—in speaking about some
of the methods adopted in contests for the nomination, “There are some things,
Mark, I would not do and cannot do, even to become President of the United States,”
and it was my impression at that time that he himself had little thought or
idea that he would ever be nominated for president.
——————————
A great deal has been said about his proverbial
good nature. He had that, and in addition to that an unequalled equipoise in
every emergency. In all my career, in business and in politics, I have never
known a man so self-contained. He always acted deliberately, and his judgments
were always weighed carefully, although there were times when his heart impulses
would respond quickly, without apparently the slightest delay. In all those
thirty years of close relations, I never saw him in a passion, never heard him
utter one word of what I would call resentment, tinged with bitterness, toward
a living person. This was again reflected in the story of the assassination
told by Mr. Milburn, who said that he could never forget the picture in the
expression of his countenance as he glanced toward the dastard assassin. In
his eyes read the words as plain as language could express it, “Why should you
do this?” And then when the assassin was hurled to the ground, when the fury
and indignation of the people had begun to assert itself, he said with almost
saintly compassion:
“Don’t let them hurt him.”
I know of nothing in all history that can compare
with the splendid climax and ending of this noble life. One of the sweetest
consolations that come to me is [409][410] the
memory that on Tuesday, preceeding [sic] his death, he asked to see a newspaper,
and when he was told, “Not to-day,” he asked, “Is Mark here?”
“Yes, Mr. President,” was the response, and in
that one sweet last remembrance was a rich reward for the years of devotion
which it had always been my pleasure to give him.
——————————
It is difficult for me to express the extent of the love and respect which I, in common with many others, felt for him personally. The feeling was the outgrowth of an appreciation of his noble, self-sacrificing nature. My affection for him and faith and confidence in him always seemed to be reciprocated, to the extent that there was never an unpleasant word passed between us, and the history of his administration, his cabinet, and his associations with public men, so entirely free from intrigue or base selfishness, I think will be a splendid example to the youth of the coming generations. There was nothing in the expression of his face or manner denoting exultation over his victory when it was announced that he was elected president. He seemed to realize fully the sacred responsibilities placed upon him, and the quiet dignity and self-possession which marked the man then and in days after were just what his personal friends expected of him. The first day I greeted him after he was inaugurated at the White House, in the course of our conversation, I inadvertently called him “Major” and “Governor,” and when I stopped to correct myself, he would say, “Each one is fitting; I’m not particular which.”
——————————
We were both of Scotch-Irish descent, but opposites in disposition. He was of a more direct descent than I, but it is thought from our dispositions that he had the Scotch and I had the Irish of the combination.