| Publication information |
|
Source: Nation Source type: magazine Document type: letter to the editor Document title: “Presidential Handshaking” Author(s): M., E. L. C. Date of publication: 26 September 1901 Volume number: 73 Issue number: 1891 Pagination: 245 |
| Citation |
| M., E. L. C. “Presidential Handshaking.” Nation 26 Sept. 1901 v73n1891: p. 245. |
| Transcription |
| full text |
| Keywords |
| presidents (handshaking in public). |
| Named persons |
| Andrew Jackson; Thomas Jefferson; E. L. C. M.; William McKinley; Theodore Roosevelt. |
| Document |
Presidential Handshaking
T E T N:
S: Whatever other
results may flow from the assassination of President McKinley, let us hope that
that object-lesson may be sufficient to put an end to our national habit of
promiscuous handshaking in public. It is hard to conceive of a spectacle more
fatuous and less edifying than that of a horde of country bumpkins, criminals,
cranks, idlers, and curiosity-mongers standing in line waiting for a chance
to grab and squeeze the hand of the unhappy Chief Executive of this country.
This habit, springing from a primitive desire on the part of the multitude to
touch the person or garment of a sovereign ruler, and fortified by the commonly
held belief that all men, in America at least, are really equal, is clearly
a superfluous anachronism in our day and age. The clasping of hands, a custom
sanctioned by usage from times immemorial, signifies, among intelligent beings
at least, primarily mutual acquaintance, esteem, and friendship. Where the parties
are absolute strangers to each other, as was the case at Buffalo, the ceremony
is meaningless, obviously dangerous, and unworthy the high office of President
of the United States. We owe much in this respect to Thomas Jefferson and Andrew
Jackson which it is doubtful if we can ever pay back in this world.
Popular regard for ancient traditions of “republican
simplicity,” and a well-grounded fear that the unprincipled scoundrels of modern
journalism might make capital out of it, have undoubtedly deterred high public
officials from putting an end to this silly and dangerous habit of promiscuous
handshaking in public places. Whether Mr. Roosevelt, who has a reputation for
enjoying personal encounters with bears and mountain lions as well as with Spaniards,
will have the moral courage and appreciation of his public duty to protect the
lives of himself and his successors by refusing, while holding the office of
President, to submit to close and intimate personal contact with hordes of unvouched-for
strangers, even if presumably friendly, is a matter of vital importance to all
admirers of republican institutions. The psychological moment for abating a
notorious public nuisance has evidently arrived.
E. L. C. M.
C, September 19, 1901.