| Publication information |
|
Source: Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science, and Art Source type: magazine Document type: letter to the editor Document title: “Anarchism and Atheism” Author(s): Constable, F. C. Date of publication: 5 October 1901 Volume number: 92 Issue number: 2397 Pagination: 432 |
| Citation |
| Constable, F. C. “Anarchism and Atheism.” Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science, and Art 5 Oct. 1901 v92n2397: p. 432. |
| Transcription |
| full text |
| Keywords |
| McKinley assassination (international response); McKinley assassination (religious response); anarchism (international response); anarchism (religious response); atheism; Leon Czolgosz (religion). |
| Named persons |
| F. C. Constable; William McKinley. |
| Document |
Anarchism and Atheism
To the Editor of the S R.
Wick Court, near Bristol, 1 October, 1901.
S,—Though this letter
is belated for publication, I cannot refrain from writing to suggest that the
underlying reason for the world’s outburst against anarchists has been missed.
The foul murder of Mr. McKinley does not, even in the present age, stand alone
for brutal cruelty. We, now living, have experienced as foul murders of Armenians
by the Turk and of Chinamen by the Russian. All qua the particular facts
equally excite our horror and disgust. But I think it will be admitted that
mankind generally regards the late murder in the United States as distinct in
kind; I think the horror and disgust it excites are also distinct in kind. If
this be so we must look beyond the particular fact of the murder of the particular
man. Some deep-seated feeling in mankind must have been affected which was untouched
by the other equally brutal murders.
I venture to think that whatever men declare with
their lips there is in nearly all a deep-seated belief in an ultimate living
cause, in a living God. Even if this feeling be merely instinctive, a bare survival
or an unconscious effort (?) at solving the lesser difficulty by the creation
of a greater, I think it exists. Now as surely as it is a necessary axiom for
the true socialist that a conscious ultimate Deity exists, so surely is it a
necessary axiom for the true anarchist that a conscious ultimate Deity does
not exist.
The anarchists’ axiomatic denial of a living first
cause explains, I think, the exceptional horror and disgust we feel at the President’s
murder. Consciously or unconsciously our deep-seated belief in God is outraged—the
murderer is not a mere human offender, he is a conspirator against heaven.
I remain,
Yours truly,
F. C. C.