Publication information |
Source: Truth Seeker Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “Insane Folly” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: 14 September 1901 Volume number: 28 Issue number: 37 Pagination: 580 |
Citation |
“Insane Folly.” Truth Seeker 14 Sept. 1901 v28n37: p. 580. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (personal response); anarchism (personal response). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz; Thomas Henry Huxley; William McKinley. |
Document |
Insane Folly
The attempted assassination of President McKinley
is one of those calamitous events in the history of nations against which the
wisdom of man is incompetent to provide. It is the deed of an insane criminal
which no one could forefend or foresee.
The shooting of the President by Czolgosz is paralleled
by the act of a man man [sic] who, with a mind unhinged by brooding over religious
subjects, is suddenly seized with homicidal mania, and commits a murder for
the imagined good of his own or the victim’s soul. Such a delusion reveals a
diseased brain, and undoubtedly there is a similar lesion in the case of the
men who commit or attempt assassinations in the belief that they are discharging
their duty to themselves and mankind.
Czolgosz calls himself an “anarchist,” and perhaps
merits the title. Certain it is that there are persons so denominating themselves
who profess to believe in the beneficeuce [sic] of assassination, of all absurd
political vagaries the least rational[.] Rejecting the authority of government,
they themselves, in carrying out their propaganda by deed, exercise the last
prerogative of government, that of taking human life—a prerogative of such doubtful
tenure that governments have in many cases relinquished it. The advocate of
assassination is like the follower of the Golden Rule, who, as Huxley said,
can exist only in a community where he is protected from the operation of his
own dogma by those who reject it.
We do not see how anyone who justifies the act
of Czolgosz could put up the most feeble defense—except the protection of the
laws whose representative has been stricken down—if he were himself to be led
out and shot. Shooting is his doctrine, and as a propagandist he must rejoice
rather than murmur on beholding such plain evidence that he has not preached
it in vain. He should congratulate himself on the spread of the doctrine among
his fellows, and count that moment the proudest of his life when he sees it
put in practice, even upon himself.
It will be a fatal day to the sympathizers with
Czolgosz and the approvers of his deed when the logic of homicidal anarchy becomes
clear to the community; for in that day the professed advocate of murder will
be lynched offhand. And his reflections, if he is given time for thought, will
be akin to those of the eagie [sic] killed by an arrow winged with his own feathers.
Nothing reported concerning Czolgosz is more easy
of belief than the statement of his stepmother that he is a fool.