Publication information |
Source: World’s Work Source type: magazine Document type: editorial Document title: “The Character of Czolgosz” Author(s): anonymous Date of publication: November 1901 Volume number: 3 Issue number: 1 Pagination: 1366 |
Citation |
“The Character of Czolgosz.” World’s Work Nov. 1901 v3n1: p. 1366. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
Leon Czolgosz; Leon Czolgosz (trial: personal response); anarchism (impact on Czolgosz). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz. |
Document |
The Character of Czolgosz
The trial, the conviction and the sentence to
death of the assassin of President McKinley were conducted with satisfactory
promptness and with impressive dignity. The Court assigned him most eminent
counsel, the trial was conducted with due regard to all the the prisoner’s rights,
and the several threats to lynch him were so well thwarted that his life was
at no time in danger from violence. His demeanor showed a stunned or an undeveloped
nature—perhaps both. He seems not to have thought out the consequences of his
crime. He was bound to know that he would sacrifice his own life, but he seems
not to have been aware before his trial of what such a doom meant. He showed
nothing of the defiance of the mood that he was in during the early days of
his imprisonment. In the courtroom his answers to questions were almost inaudible,
and he displayed terror when there seemed danger that he might be lynched after
his removal from Buffalo to Auburn.
There was something childish—an undeveloped, stunted
intelligence—shown in his demeanor. His “philosophy” did not sustain him. He
maintained, no doubt with truth, that he had no accomplices. The terrible crime
was conceived by himself as the result of a naturally weak nature meditating
on the doctrine of violence. It is probable that, if he had not happened to
encounter an apostle of anarchy, he would have lived a commonplace, undeveloped
life, without doing any act of violence and without developing any particularly
vicious traits. There was nothing to show that he had any proper realization
of the enormity of the crime that he committed. He was simply a pitiful victim
of anarchism. But he was not insane, not irresponsible. He was only a degenerate.
He gives the best possible reason for all judicious restraint on the preaching
of dangerous doctrines. When they lodge in a weak mind like his there is always
a grave danger of tragic results.