Publication information |
Source: Bisbee Daily Review Source type: newspaper Document type: editorial Document title: “Protecting the President” Author(s): anonymous City of publication: Bisbee, Arizona Territory Date of publication: 28 February 1903 Volume number: 6 Issue number: 221 Pagination: [2] |
Citation |
“Protecting the President.” Bisbee Daily Review 28 Feb. 1903 v6n221: p. [2]. |
Transcription |
full text |
Keywords |
McKinley assassination (government response); presidential assassination (laws against); presidential assassination (legal penalties); anarchism (government response); anarchism (dealing with). |
Named persons |
Leon Czolgosz; William McKinley. |
Document |
Protecting the President
Ever since the assassination of
President McKinley the feeling has been practically universal throughout the
country that some law must be enacted to provide better protection against anarchist
crimes. Such a law has now been passed by congress. It provides that the murder
or attempted murder of a President or of an official in the line of Presidential
succession shall be a crime against federal law and shall be tried in the federal
courts. Death is the penalty fixed for such a murder, while the would-be assassin
who attempts to kill the President but fails, may be either executed or subjected
to a long imprisonment, the minimum term being ten years. In addition, the law
provides that those who advocate or inspire such crimes shall be punishable
by either fine or imprisonment.
It is not to be supposed that any statutory decree
will put an end to anarchy or afford a perfect safeguard against anarchial crimes.
Murderous fanaticism is not to be wiped out by edict, as the history of Russia
makes painfully clear. The new law, however, provides a sure and reasonably
expeditious method of bringing criminals of this class to trial and effective
punishment. Those who may contemplate such crimes have warning in advance that
in whatever state they may attempts the deed, and whether they succeed or fail,
they will be punished. Moreover, those who have misused the liberty of speech
to advocate crime will no longer feel so free to impart criminal teachings to
such mentally warped and morally weak creatures as Czolgosz.
Taken together with the new regulations restricting
the immigration of anarchists, the law should have the effect of checking the
spread of crime and restraining the individual anarchist. At the same time it
is in no sense an extreme measure and imposes no restrictions that any fair-minded
citizen can regard as an invasion of constitutional rights or privileges.